Re: Margaret L.

---

• To: s*@eskimo.com
• Subject: Re: Margaret L.
• From: K*@aol.com
• Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 09:24:12 EDT
• Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 06:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
• Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"tkKh11.0.U52.gx5or"@mx2>
• Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com

In a message dated 98-08-05 09:15:11 EDT, you write:

<< 
 Yes, but it's a communique from RAFI.  Considering the prejudice against
 this organization, it's not going to help.  Margaret
  >>

I think it is a mistake to refer to the objections against your side of the
discussion as "prejudice against RAFI."  Did you read the link?  Did you read
my objections to it?  I know nothing about RAFI but I do know how to read, and
what argument is.  I would like to give RAFI and your side of the discussion a
fair hearing but dismissing my objections as "prejudice against RAFI" only
gives me further inclination  to believe that you don't understand the issue
either.  I've said enough about my objections, and I intend to limit my
discussion on this list to issues of propagation.

Linda

• Prev by Date: Re: Lily Seed
• Next by Date: Re: Hollyhocks- self pollinating?
• Prev by thread: Re: Margaret L.
• Next by thread: Canadian Hemlock