This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
RE: Using botanical and common names
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: RE: Using botanical and common names
- From: A* D* <a*@crwys.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 20:30:58 +0100 (BST)
- Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"Oq0ca1.0.a27.TjFhr"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
On Wed 15 Jul, McAlpine, Duncan G wrote:
> As my grandfather told me, it is high recommended to learn the Latin
> names of plants versus the common name. He mentioned;"If you are talking
> to a someone who knows plants and you state the common name, they can
> assume a large assortment of plants, but if you state the Latin name,
> they will understand what you are talking about".
>
> I would like to see the Latin names on the mailing list. I would
> support the archives in an more efficient manner.
>
> Duncan
>
I totally agree, Duncan. There has been a lot of chat about the 4
o'clock plant which meant nothing to me so I deleted it . I have now
managed to 'translate' it to mirabilis jalapa, vernacular name Marvel of
Peru, which means a whole lot more to me. Too late I have deleted all
the references, but at least the bot. name allowed me to find a picture
on the net. So please, if you must use the common name, do take the
trouble to add the botanical name as well then everybody will be happy.
--
Allan Day Hereford HR2 7AU allan@crwys.demon.co.uk
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index