This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Using botanical and common names
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: Using botanical and common names
- From: K* W* <g*@istar.ca>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 00:01:23 -0500
- References: <3.0.3.32.19980717105912.009b7260@pophost.micron.net> <35B0124D.2730@olympus.net>
- Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 20:56:19 -0700
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"ctLU31.0.8E.Zp1ir"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
Diana Politika's wonderful post finally prompted me to jump into this
discussion, which I have been following with interest.
As a seedswoman, grower and nurseryperson, I couldn't deal with plants
by their common names, even if that were my choice!
And I think this is an important point. It is not a matter of choice,
snobery, preference, or lack of courtesy to others. It is simply
calling plants by their proper names.
My current seed catalogue lists over 1300 species of perennials. I
include a common name, whenever one exists (and have to go through the
painful process of choosing the name most commonly used-which is
always a subjective decision from where I garden in north-eastern
Canada). I imagine some of my international customers being totally
mystified (and amused) by some of the names.
Of those 1300 species, less than half, in fact have common names. I
believe everyone would agree, however that these plants certainly
deserve to be known, grown in gardens, and discussed on this forum.
Kristl Walek
Gardens North Seeds
N. Gower, Ontario Canada Z4
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index