This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Growing Under Lights
- To: s*@eskimo.com
- Subject: Re: Growing Under Lights
- From: J*@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 16:06:14 -0500 (EST)
- Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 13:07:29 -0800 (PST)
- Resent-From: seeds-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"zAzfs2.0.eY6.Fi9Uq"@mx2>
- Resent-Sender: seeds-list-request@eskimo.com
Hello all. I was wondering what the list felt in response tot he question
that the common shop lights should be replaced every year. It is supposedly
for the reason that a certain light wave is "burned out" (gone) and it is
undetectable from the naked eye. I would be very happy to find this not
true, as it would mean purchasing a couple of new cases in my situation.
Any info would be appreciated.
Karen Ernst
SE Michigan, who's snowless, but cold, 30*F
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index