Re: [SG] Tattoo

---

• To: s*@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU
• Subject: Re: [SG] Tattoo
• From: j* <j*@WARWICK.NET>
• Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 23:52:37 -0400
• Comments: Authenticated sender is <u1005076@host.warwick.net>
• Priority: normal

Clyde wrote:
> In a message dated 5/18/1998 8:26:09 PM Central Daylight Time, sue@INFOZOO.COM
> writes:
>
> <<
>  I've seen discussion about h. Tattoo, but have not found a picture of it.
>  Do you have one handy?
>   >>
> I have a pic of it as diplayed at Cut-Leaf Show where it won
> 100000000000000[My motto: Do Not Exaggerate!] awards. I'll send you the image.
> if anyone else wants to see it, please let me know.
> I am copying this post to Tony Avent, the introducer and seller (Plant
> Delights Nursery)of 'Tattoo' and asking him to tell us if it is still
> available. It is WONDERFUL!! Unique. A conversation piece. A piece de la
> resistance, if you will!

Ah man!  Here I was thinking y'all got off topic and were
talking about a subject near & dear to my heart (literally):
why tattoos hold their color better in shade.  hrumph.  <G>

Clyde, rather than send the image to a whole bunch of folks (I
would love to see it) would you like it up on the net
temporarily?  I'm sure there is sufficient space on the Munchkin
website for it (See how easily I offer up Gene's $??).

Jaime
jknoble@warwick.net
NW NJ, zone 6/5

• References:
  • Re: [SG] Tattoo
    • From: C* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: [SG] Kirengeshoma palmata
• Next by Date: [SG] Fwd: [SG] Tattoo---Good News!
• Prev by thread: Re: [SG] Tattoo
• Next by thread: Re: [SG] Tattoo