Re: Slow starters


Hello Laurie,

Tuesday, May 01, 2001, 12:50:46 AM, you wrote:

lpn> Hello All,

lpn> I've popped out of lurkdom for a moment to ask a quick question.
lpn> Most
lpn> of the new Sibs I planted last year have just begun to show a bit of
lpn> green above ground here in northern MN.  There are three, however,
lpn> that have not yet shown signs of life, and I'm beginning to wonder
lpn> whether they've expired over this most severe and prolonged winter or
lpn> whether they're just slow starters.  Could any of you offer any
lpn> insights as to the timing of the appearance of spring growth on VI
lpn> LUIHN, KING OF KINGS, and CAMBRIDGE relative to that of most other
lpn> Sibs?  Are these three known to be slow spring starters?

lpn> Thank you in advance for any information you may provide.

lpn> Laurie
lpn> zone 3b, northern MN                                                
lpn>      
Cambridge is not slow spring starter. Though it is not first, but
early starter for me. Delay of your plants is maybe result of not
sufficient good establishment last year. Hope they will start, only be
patient, or maybe at this time have been started.
First starters in my garden are CHERRY LYN, LAVENDER BOUNTY and
PLEASURE OF MAY. Weather is warm here in Lithuania and plants grow up
rapid. Tomorrow start watering season.
-- 
Best regards,
 Edmundas                            S*@kaunas.omnitel.net



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Clubmom is the first free organization dedicated to rewarding and celebrating Moms! Join today - it's free - and get a free year-long subscription
for Parents magazine - just for being a Mom!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BVVVCC/YKfCAA/OZ8EAA/VTJVlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index