RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling
- To: "Space Age Robin" S*@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling
- From: "Neil A Mogensen" n*@charter.net
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:15:03 -0400
Francelle, I seem to have missed some messages, as
Chuck Chapman's quote of your text was the first of it I had
seen.
I thought 16-31 particularly beautiful.
I would gladly give it space here as guest, but be forewarned--this are is a
serious trial for TB irises. Siberians and JI's thrive (if given
adequate water), TB's often dwindle away unless treated very carefully.
Being reasonably frost-proof or the ability to bloom from an increase is a great
asset. Pineappling rarely occurs, but if an abnormal fan becomes obvious,
slicing it off allows normal side increases to form and they are normal.
I've had the impression Pineappling seems to be a
disturbance in the enzymatic control of "apical meristem" development, and may
not be due primarily to a foreign organism. It also, I believe, is
partially a response to heat stress, although in Idaho we had temps up to 115
once in a decade or so, yet no (or rarely) pineappling resulted.
Probably the stressor has to persist more than a day or two.
Our weather here, like Linda Mann's, suffers
from the "Alberta Clipper" (apologies to the Alberta and other Great Plains
Canadians) alternating with the upward flow of Gulf-enriched air masses
originating in the tropical Pacific off the coast of Peru and
Equador. Astonishingly rapid shifts from
wet 80's to dry 20's, as Linda has mentioned, can and do happen here, plus
another unpleasant sort of switcheroo that is a result of a Low off the coast of
Maine and Nova Scotia swinging cold air down across New England. Those
impulses appear to follow the eastern face of the Appalachins down to here, then
stop, rarely affecting Greenville-Spartanburg, SC, area more than to a mild
degree. They are devastating here, somewhat over a thousand feet higher in
elevation.
The forecast about which I was cringing of 26
degrees Monday (yesterday) morning, about which Donald asked, was eleven
degrees off--we got down to 37--sigh of relief.
Frost damage often takes up to 48 hours to heal if
it does heal, so I won't be able to tell just how much damage has been done just
yet. The wind broke many seedling stalks, and a few in the named
area. Gusts hit hard several times here Saturday night and Sunday morning,
when an inch of snow covered the garden with the temperature around 28
degrees. The problem with the temp was that it lasted a bit too
long.
Everything in bloom went glassy then limp, and a
lot of the azaleas look like boiling water got poured over them. Since, a
few damaged, but alive, blooms have opened on SDB's and IB-types (such as the
MTB Lady Emma). Buds on some TBs showing color looked hurt
yesterday. I haven't bothered going out yet today. We have virga
going on now rehydrating the air above us, with a 60% rain forecast for this
afternoon and tonight. The rain has started on three sides of us
already. The moisture will help heal.
Given the caveat, yes, I would be glad to guest
either or both 16-31 and the other seedling. Since Purple Pirouette
is one of those named in the probable non-producers, the 16-31
seedling would fit the SAGE design the better. I would be happy to
cross it with the SA's, as thanks to Bill Burleson, I have some of those in the
test, as well as Solar Fire, which has a stalk coming up, and some not
listed--two flounced sibs from Christopherson--In A Heartbeat and Heartbeat
Away. In next year's bloom my options will be wider, and hopefully those
ordered this year will be able to bloom too.
Your 16-31 will be excellent to test, since if
4-plex SA basic factor as Chuck suggests is required for SA expression, this
seedling should be 2-plex at least. If Purple Pirouette is non-SA producer
because of an inhibitor or normalizer factor (presumably dominant) the seedling
ratios of SA's in the seedlings of 16-31 should exceed 1 out of 6 by some
significant number.
What I expect is some SAs, but a difficult to fit
to a simple Punnett Square number, since I suspect we are looking at a
multi-factor system, and/or an allelic range that includes BS and BSE as part of
the spread. The interpreters of the data from our SAGE crosses are going
to do a fair amount of head scratching, I suspect.
Michael M's photos showing a variety of
tissue-originating points for the SA event and the various parts of some of the
more complex ones suggest a rather complex combination of things is going
on. Your seedling(s) could well help sort this out.
Neil Mogensen z 7 Reg 4 western NC
mountains
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling
- From: "F* E*"
- From: "F* E*"
- RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling
- Prev by Date: RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] New Space Agers in Ca [William A. Setchell]
- Next by Date: [SpaceAgeRobin] Re: Space Age Genetics [OneofCultivars]
- Previous by thread: RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling
- Next by thread: RE: [SpaceAgeRobin] RE: SA inhibiting seedling