Re: Long postings which are out of scope.

---

• To: <v*@eskimo.com>
• Subject: Re: Long postings which are out of scope.
• From: "* M* <p*@pris.bc.ca>
• Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 11:15:25 -0800
• Resent-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:11:37 -0800
• Resent-From: veggie-list@eskimo.com
• Resent-Message-ID: <"-Ykt91.0._86.MV4_q"@mx1>
• Resent-Sender: veggie-list-request@eskimo.com

Duncan,

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!

Granny Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: McAlpine, Duncan G <Duncan.McAlpine@PSS.Boeing.com>
To: 'veggie-list@eskimo.com' <veggie-list@eskimo.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 03, 1998 7:52 AM
Subject: Long postings which are out of scope.


>I sent a note to the person who submitted the chain letter and informed
>them, they were removed from the list.  I received an apology from the
>sender who was not on the list but used the betters half email address
>to forward the post.  So in conclusion, don't blame the member of the
>mailing list but blame the lesser half who forward the note.
>
>I will remove anyone who sends these long posts.  I can tolerate certain
>postings which are out of scope, but not long chain letters
>
>listowner
>Duncan
>
>

• Prev by Date: Re: Stan's hot tomato
• Next by Date: Re: Stan's hot tomato
• Prev by thread: Long postings which are out of scope.
• Next by thread: RE: veggie-digest Digest V98 #23