This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Roses
- To: woodyplants@mallorn.com
- Subject: Re: Roses
- From: B* C* <b*@cleome.ultranet.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 20:13:12 -0400
Reminds me of the "NEW IMPROVED DISEASE RESISTANT BLAZE" climber.
Succumbed to mildew every year. I finally ripped it out in year three.
At 02:42 PM 6/12/98 EDT, you wrote:
>Greg in Chalfont, PA wrote:
>
>>The first thing to take into account is that they are
>'>disease-resistant', not 'disease-proof'. The conditions (soil, sun,
>>air) they are in affect them as much as anything. I think the key is to
>>find the variety that does well in your particular conditions. Proper
>>pruning also plays a big part in controlling disease.
>
>Greg, all you say is true. Still, there are some plants that are, overall,
>more resistant than others, and some whose "disease-resistance" is great
>catalog fiction. Sharing experiences with others is a great way to learn
how
>these plants respond in real-life garden conditions, whatever they may be.
>--Janis
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
>message text UNSUBSCRIBE WOODYPLANTS
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE WOODYPLANTS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index