hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: How big is big enough? and how tall do they get?

  • Subject: Re: How big is big enough? and how tall do they get?
  • From: "Ronald h Kessler" <ronlene@worldnet.att.net>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 21:18:57 -0500 (CDT)

A list is a good idea. If it contained photos of the petiole and the leaf of all of the species, it would be a GREAT idea.  Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: StroWi
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: How big is big enough? and how tall do they get?

Randy,

I think this is something most Amorphophallus growers are interested in. The list you propose is a very good idea!

I would like to take the chance to add the question how tall they get at a definite tuber size (lets say at good light and growing conditions):

Would any one know, if there is a close correlation between tuber size and PETIOLE HIGHT in Amorphophallus titanum?
If someone has figures or even an idea, I would be very intersted. (It could tell me when to built a higher greenhouse for my A.t. or do something different; see below)
I ask this in the same context as I asked for the effect of growth retardants on the petiole hight of A.t. or other big aroids with a single leaf some time ago. I did not get a response when I posted my question, but I think it should work, since growth retardants generally inhibit cell elongation to a certain extent. (Normally they are used in horticulture to shorten internode length in ornamentals like Poinsettias and others)

Looking forward to any comment!

Bernhard.
Dollbergen, Germany
approx. zone 6/7

"Randall M. Story" <story@caltech.edu> schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious if there is any interest in starting a discussion or compiling a
> list as to what constitutes "blooming size" for various species. I'm
> thinking primarily of Amorphophallus and related stinky tuberous aroids,
> although it need not be limited to these.
>
> I realize that estimates depend on one's growing conditions, the particular
> cultivar, luck, etc. However even SOME guess as to when a particular plant
> "might" bloom, with a size range or "ballpark" number would be useful, to me
> at least. It would be nice to know whether a particular tuber has a chance
> of blooming at 1 inch or 4 inches or not till 8 inches in diameter!
>
> This information seems particularly hard to find, even more so than
> estimates of cold hardiness.
>
> Do people think this is a good idea? If there is any interest, people could
> send me their experiences and if I get enough responses I could post a list
> here. I'm guessing that even a short list of the most commonly available
> species could be useful to a lot of us.
>
> A specific question I have at the moment: how big does an A. bulbifer tuber
> have to be to have some chance of blooming?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randy Story
>






 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index