Re: Philodendron selloum
- Subject: Re: Philodendron selloum
- From: Neil Carroll <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:04:17 -0600 (CST)
Russ, Petra's pretty knowledgable on this stuff. The following is
paraphrased from Aroids by Deni Bown:
some confusion has existed in the past over P. selloum and P.
bipinnatifidum....Engler considered them seperate species. the two names
have in the past been used to differentiate two different populations
(Gottsberger and Amaral 1984) and In 1991 Mayo joined the two into one
single species ....P. bippinatifidum is the true name....P. selloum has been
reduced into synonomy.
From: Clarence Hammer <email@example.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Philodendron selloum
> Ref Petra's comments. P. selloum is now bipinnatifidum? I'm not aware of
>this, all my information indicates they have been and are 2 distinct
>I doubt if selloum could survive 7B or further north without extraordinary
>measures. Perhaps massive mulching of the root zone, some of the cold
>protective 'fleeces' and other materials could save a portion of the bottom
>of the plant to come back the following year. All bets would be off with
>exceptionally severe winters.