hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: apomictic?

Jason Hernadez wrote:

>If the "normal" seedling is less vigorous than the apomictic ones--and =
>therefore be at a competitive disadvantage to them--why does the plant =
>it?  Pollination/fertilization costs the plant energy, so why do it just=
>produce a disadvantaged seedling?

This is the thousand dollar question and the whole issue is so complex
that it is almost impossible to define and describe succinctly.
Apomixis is probably a second line means by which reproduction can
take place.  Why the product of true fertilisation of the ovum  is
frequently less vigorous at the outset remains unanswered. The simple
fact is that it does in Citrus species at the very least.  Why is
anybody's guess.  Any 'hybrid' is more likely to be disadvantaged
compared to the true species in any case - just look at the odds of
finding a 'better-than-the-parent-plant' from any batch of hybrids. =20

The ideal is that similar species should reproduce with each other.
However, plants being as diverse and as exploitative as they are, have
innumerable means by which they can ensure their survival.  Apomixis
is only one of many methods by which at the very least, some of the
genes can be passed on in some species.  It is far from perfect, but
at least it is reproduction.

David Poole

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index