hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
  • From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid (prive)" hetter@worldonline.nl
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 17:56:13 +0100
  • Importance: Normal

Hi Rand,

There IS of course always a slim chance that somebody in Leiden shipped you
a real Amorph instead of the Dracontium and, oh wonder, a bulbil-forming
species (like Am. bulbifer or Am. muelleri)................


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu
> [mailto:aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu]Namens Rand Nicholson
> Verzonden: vrijdag 30 januari 2004 14:30
> Aan: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu
> Onderwerp: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
> Hello Wilbert:
> No real puzzle.
> Obviously, in a highly excitable state of phalloid enthusiasm
> after receiving my shipment, I mislabeled Dracontium
> spruceanum as Amorphophallus spruceanum. Wishful thinking or
> duh? I suppose this is how some of those ugly taxonomic
> rumors get started. However, D. spruceanum _does_ look almost
> exactly like A. spruceanum (which, of course, does not exist)
> to my layman's eye.  And, a rather large not-a-bulbil is
> developing on top of the leaf petiole. Do these eventually
> ever _do_ anything, or are they just arthritic wannabees?
> That clears that up.
> Thanks, and drop over for a beer some time you are in the country.
> Rand
> Eastern Maritime Canada z 5b (& -16 C.)
> >Hi Rand,
> >
> >This is a bit of a puzzling message: if A. stands for
> Amorphophallus, then
> >there's something wrong with the name because Amorphophallus
> spruceanum
> >doesn't exist. I did also send Dracontium spruceanum to some
> of you but
> >that's hardly an Amorph and Dracontiums do NOT make foliar
> bulbils, although
> >they DO develop swollen joints in the leaves to some degree.
> >
> >Cheerio,
> >Wilbert

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement