Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum

---

• Subject: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid (prive)" h*@worldonline.nl
• Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 06:42:31 +0100
• Importance: Normal

Rand,

You can make life easier on all of us by mailing me a scan of the leaf and
I'll put us out of our mysery.

Lord P


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu
> [a*@lists.ncsu.edu]Namens Rand Nicholson
> Verzonden: zaterdag 31 januari 2004 5:06
> Aan: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu
> Onderwerp: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
>
>
> Wilbert Et Al:
>
> Ok. I'll go with the A. muelleri since I already have A.
> bulbifer. Now, who's dreaming ... although it does seem odd
> that the Drac. would go to all this trouble just to make
> something round and useless.
>
> TFIC
>
> Rand
>
>
>
> >Hi Rand,
> >
> >There IS of course always a slim chance that somebody in
> Leiden shipped you
> >a real Amorph instead of the Dracontium and, oh wonder, a
> bulbil-forming
> >species (like Am. bulbifer or Am. muelleri)................
> >
> >Wilbert

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
    • From: R* N*

• References:
  • Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
    • From: R* N*

• Prev by Date: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• Next by Date: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• Previous by thread: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum
• Next by thread: Re: [aroid-l] A. spruceanum