hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Subspecies vs. species?

In a message dated 1/15/99 2:16:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, greg@ezi-
learn.com.au writes:

> Thanks to Alistair for having a go but I was interested in the difference
>  between subspecies and variety.  We have a number of times where authors
>  change a variety to a subspecies only to have later authors ignore this and
>  revert them to varieties.  Couldn't one of these terms be reasonably made
>  redundant?

Not entirely.  Hitchcock and Cronquist, who wrote the "Bible" of Pacific
Northwest flora, use both terms, subspecies and variety.  Generally, they use
"subspecies" for variants which occur in discrete populations (e.g.,
geographic races), and "variety" for variants which occur periodically within
populations (e.g., pink-flowered plants of an otherwise blue-flowered
species).  However, this brings up another question--what is the difference
between "variety" and "forma"?

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index