hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: Line breeding vs hybridization

  • Subject: Re: Line breeding vs hybridization
  • From: "Eduardo Goncalves" <edggon@hotmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:58:38 -0500 (CDT)

Hi Jim,

>We have no basis for disagreement. Hybridization has played a major role in
>the evolution of many plants and animals. Linnaeus' early work however did
>not separate "natural self-replicating populations" from man-induced
>non-stable genomes that were cultivars created by humans for our own 
>(e.g., Canis familiaris). I think you would agree that only the natural
>populations fulfill what systematists consider to be "species".

  Yes, I think you're correct. Anyway, I still don't know what _I_ should
consider to be species! I am losing my faith!

                                 Best wishes,


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index