hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Info on Epipremnum spp.

  • Subject: Re: Info on Epipremnum spp.
  • From: GeoffAroid@aol.com
  • Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 09:35:58 -0500 (CDT)

thanks for the info on Plantscape and for the very clear and amusing defence 
of botanical taxonomists. In my experience the general public are not that up 
on common names for aroids anyway and will accept pretty much anything the 
growers present them with. If the growers could be pursuaded to change I dont 
think the public would either notice or get very agitated, especially if 
synonyms were given in plant catalogues etc. It is ridiculous when really 
ancient names are continually dredged up when a much more suitable and widely 
used name is available. Arum cornutum is probably the best (or worst....) 
example, I still see that regularly labelled as such in markets. 

Best wishes,
Geoffrey Kibby

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index