hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: why scientists don't just give up the names battle

  • Subject: RE: why scientists don't just give up the names battle
  • From: "Cooper, Susan L." <SLCooper@scj.com>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:10:02 -0500 (CDT)

Good point, Jim. Your note about permanency reminded me about a comment
someone made about the writer Stephen King:  something to the effect that
his books are popular now, but in 20-30 years (or less) they will be
difficult to read due to the fact that he uses so many brand names.  I just
read a book of his where he kept mentioning a certain type of toy by name,
and for half the book I had no idea of what he was talking about (the wooden
paddle with a rubber band thing attached, with a rubber ball on the end).

I'm only a hobbyist (and I wouldn't call my thumb green), and I still call
Zantedeschia calla lilies sometimes, but when people mention voodoo lilies I
have no idea what they are talking about!
Susan Cooper

-----Original Message-----
From: Lewandjim@aol.com [mailto:Lewandjim@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:03 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L
Subject: Re: why scientists don't just give up the names battle

This is descending into a discussion between people who are simply not 
talking the "same language". Taxonomists arnd hobbyists are not at odds with

one another.

Scientific names reflect the relationships between and among organisms. Once

a phylogenetic error has been detected the name is changed to reflect the

By contrast, common names are an effort to assign a permanent literary 
reference to a common plant in cultivation. Barring the difficulties of 
alphabets, linguistics and regional dialects, even the common names are 
scarcely permanent in usage.

They cannot be equated nor used to achieve the same end.

    Jim Langhammer

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index