hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Amorpho titanum crosses!!!

  • Subject: Re: Amorpho titanum crosses!!!
  • From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid" <hetter@worldonline.nl>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:07:27 -0500 (CDT)

Anthurium Jungle King is not even a cultivar name, it is a trade designation
of  Anthurium ellipticum 'Antadalo'. But leaving that aside, I see that some
of you don't realise that a clonally propagaged narrow aspect of the
variation of a species IS a proper cultivar! It has always been like that:
you can also pick a nice white coloured variant from an otherwise red
flowering species in nature, propagate it clonally, see to it that it
follows the DUS norm (Distinction, Uniformity and Stability) and there you
have a perfect cultivar. The point is that in your mind you'd have to cross
the (grey) barrier between nature and society as soon as you pick a plant
from the wild and deliberately it under artificial circumstances in order to
stabilise some or all of its characters.


----- Original Message -----
From: <GeoffAroid@aol.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L <aroid-l@mobot.org>
Sent: donderdag 21 juni 2001 22:10
Subject: Re: Amorpho titanum crosses!!!

> Ron,
> I am sure the Sri Lankan greengrocers in Tooting must think I obtain some
> strange illicit drugs from the amorph tubers, or that I eat vast
> of the curries in which they put them! They have probably sold more in the
> last month or two than the previous year (two other growers have now asked
> to get them some too...).
> I agree with most of the comments on hybrids given here, the majority do
> improve on nature, although I suspect most of us are only too happy to
> various hybrid garden plants without giving it a second thought. It is a
> fairly natural thing for man to pick the biggest, the darkest, the
> the best scented flowers etc etc and its only a short step from there to
> selectively crossing. I think the orchid people have it right, at least
> register everything and one can look up parentage very easily. All these
> cultivar names which mean nothing (what IS Anthurium Jungle King?!, or
> Spathiphyllum Sensation?!) because they wont tell you or dont know the
> parentage are not helping anyone. Yes, we absolutely must conserve and
> disseminate species as much as possible to ensure their survival in
> collections (is it too pessimistic to feel that their habitats just will
> survive?) and for future generations to admire their stunning beauty. I am
> not against hybrids per se as long as the species are cared for, and the
> hybrids well documented. A giant konjac-titanum in the backyard may be
> unlikely but it would certainly get noticed.....
> Just wait till they use gene surgery to join a Spathiphyllum with
> Amorphophallus, Spathiphyllum "Dracula's Delight" anyone...?
> Geoffrey Kibby
> London

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index