Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106
- Subject: Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106
- From: &* A* <a*@wp.pl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 21:55:16 +0200
|
Dear Alan,
So probably all two (!) other photos found by
google on the web as T. kunmingense (except my plant) are also
incorrectly identified.
and my plant was identical, the spathe external
side was brown,
while in the IAS page photos of T.
horsfieldii inflorescences vary from green through yellow to olive, no
brown form shown,
but the spadix looks the same as
mine.
I see there must be a big mess in the small-tubered
aroids sold on auctions and in "rarity" webshops.
First I wanted to write to you about a Pinellia
bought on an auction as "Typhonium alpinum".
Today the first inflorescence opened, I took some
photos and I noticed this is the same taxon as your photos of Pinellia ternata 'lanceolate leaf form'. I
attach photos of my plant taken today.
I don't doubt this is P. ternata, but for
many years I've had a green spathed form with broad leaflets. I wonder how
two so different forms of the same species could evolute, don't you think
it is a subspecies, a variety or even a cultivar?
Marek
|
Attachment:
DSC07347.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC07350.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC07353.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC07354.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC07355.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
DSC07360.jpg
Description: JPEG image
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106
- Next by Date: Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106
- Previous by thread: Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106
- Next by thread: Re: Pinellia pedatisecta Rec. Nov. 4, 2005 as Ty. kumingense T-106