hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: is it an Anubias?

Dear Ferenc,


Well, I stand corrected, this IS an Anubis not a Schismatoglottis. Could you do an additional photo that shows the lower part of the petiole and the petiolar sheath.


We all learn constantly!








From: aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com [mailto:aroid-l-bounces@www.gizmoworks.com] On Behalf Of Ferenc Lengyel
Sent: Sunday, 12 June, 2011 6:04 PM
To: Discussion of aroids
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] is it an Anubias?


Dear Ted,


Now I have removed the spathe, and took some photos:


The inflorescence cut open:


The inflorescence cut open from side view:


The spathe without spadix (the contamination on the pic is a piece of the spathe, getting there from the scissors during cutting):

The inflorescence is relatively small, but I think, it is a forced flowering, the result of hormonal treatment, as three of the Anubias plants which I got with the same shipment is developing an inflorescense too, though they are rather small. 




Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement