hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] Are they both Amorphophallus bulbifer?

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Are they both Amorphophallus bulbifer?
  • From: "Wilbert Hetterscheid (prive)" <hetter@worldonline.nl>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 06:32:07 +0100
  • Importance: Normal

Ken,

yes, they both seem to be bulbifer. The tuber of muelleri has its surface
covered with distinct swollen root scars, whereas bulbifer is smooth in that
respect, as in your picture.

Cheerio,
Wilbert


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu
> [mailto:aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu]Namens ken@spatulacity.com
> Verzonden: zondag 21 maart 2004 5:48
> Aan: Aroid list
> Onderwerp: [aroid-l] Are they both Amorphophallus bulbifer?
>
>
> I have two tubers that are both supposed to be Amorphophallus
> bulbifer. The
> big question, are they? They look very different! Photo can
> be seen at
> http://dragocactoid.com/WhichIsBulbifer-50.jpg (243K).
>
> The one on the right was bought last spring, already planted
> and sprouted.
> I have a sneaking suspicion it was a bulbil at the time but I
> never saw it
> out of the dirt. Some may remember that I inquired about it growing 3
> leaves - and Lord P remarked that it was very happy and would
> put on a lot
> of size, which is an understatement since it's about 5"
> across, much larger
> than the pot it was originally planted in. The plant (and it's twin
> brother) did produce some epiphyllar bulbils. (I'll note that
> the leaf and
> bulbils looked to me exactly like those illustrated on the A.
> muelleri page
> at aroid.org, but maybe bulbifer looks like that too...)
>
> The tuber on the left I just bought from a fellow in India,
> in cooperation
> with another list member. I've never seen it in growth.
>
> I now return to the original question... Is one, or both,
> likely to be A.
> bulbifer? Are they generally so variable? My konjacs all look
> like each
> other, as do the dunnii, albus, and all the others I have
> more than one of.
>
> Thanks,
> Ken



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement