RE: [Aroid-l] Names for different forms?
- Subject: RE: [Aroid-l] Names for different forms?
- From: "Julius Boos" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:27:32 +0000
From : Brian Williams <email@example.com>
Reply-To : Discussion of aroids <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent : Tuesday, March 13, 2007 3:20 AM
To : Discussion of aroids <email@example.com>
Subject : [Aroid-l] Names for different forms?
This all goes back to an issue that to date has not been 'solved' by the
aroid group, and which is a VERY difficult issue, namely the cultivar names
and the correct registering of these names according to whatever
horticultural rules/laws that may apply.
The IAS has nominated several people over the past several years ( I can
recall at least three) to do something about setting up some sort of
registry to legitimize some or all of these names which are being bantered
about, but to date I think the progress on instituting this system is not in
place or even being worked on.
I have mentioned on several occasions that when man collectes a certain
plant from nature, he usually selects one which to him is the most
attractive out of several hundred, maybe thousands of other 'less
attractive' specimens he may see in the field. All of these plants, both
the 'attractive' ones AND the less attractive ones are still all variations
of ONE species.
All I can suggest at this time is that you make a label that explains what
the particular clone or var. of that plant is, for example Philodendron
stenolobum var. narrow/wavy/long leaf, and/or P. stenolobum var. short and
broad leaf, or 'Anthurium warocqueanum var. Murline Lydon minature', vs.
'Anthu. warocqueanum var. large leaf '. Collection data and collectors
name would be another good bit of information to keep with all wild
Perhaps Derek Burch can give some sort of suggestion or soloution that may
serve you guys better??
I have recently been trying to up grade my data base of names as well as
redo all my tags and make sure everything has as much data and information
as possible. I have a few questions on forms. I know many plants have
several forms of the same species. I would like to know if their are names
for these forms or even if the science community really makes note of it?
If not would putting a added portion to the name to help ID different
forms be possible? If so who should come up with these name? Here are a
few for instance off hand that I really think should have some more
information. Their seems to be two very different forms of Veitchii one
with wider leaves and much larger ripples. Then another form with thinner
leaves and a much more rippled effect. I know that naming all slight
different forms would not be worth while but for some very noticeable
differences it could help people know exactly what they are getting and
their seems to be a major price difference in one form compared to the
other. Another one that comes to mind is the two forms of Anthurium
warocqueanum one that can get 3 to 4 feet long and the smaller slender
form with hardly any back lobes. They are very noticeably different yet go
by the exact same name. If one was to order the plant under these name
they could end up with either form though one form of each is usually much
more sought after.<<
Aroid-l mailing list
Aroid-l mailing list
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |