hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: "Elephant Ear"???

Title: Re: [Aroid-l] "Elephant Ear"???
The problem of how "elephant ears" are labeled would be hard to pin on any one source without a doubt. When I look at the information that has come in to Steve about Colocasia esculenta over the past few days, (and granted I have not seen it all), it would seem that this is as wide open a species concept as I've come across in the plant world, as far as I can think this time of day off the top of my head. When you think about it, in other genera within our own family here (speaking of Araceae of course), the size or texture of a leaf blade, appearance of the venation, or cross-section of petiole showing different shapes can make the difference between species. But if my understanding is correct here, this species concept is plastic enough that leaf size, surface, appearance of venation, (i.e. raised and rounded or angled, or flat), petiole appearance, position of inflorescence, shape, size, color of inflorescence, and of course habitat and resulting vegetative growth, and likely pollinator differences as well between habitat extremes of wet and dry - none of these things matter with this species. A most interesting dilemma - it is no wonder that it has so many synonyms, both scientific and common. When all the usual species defining characteristics are thrown out, where do we go? With such incredibly wide degrees of variation, whether one is using the common name or the botanical, another could still have no earthly idea of the image of plant being discussed. An interesting  dilemma indeed.

Aroid-L mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement