hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Cultivar registration

  • To: Multiple recipients of list AROID-L <aroid-l@mobot.org>
  • Subject: Re: Cultivar registration
  • From: "Bonaventure W Magrys" <magrysbo@shu.edu>
  • Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 22:11:07 -0500 (CDT)

SelbyHort@aol.com on 05/09/2000 08:08:41 PM
Please respond to aroid-l@mobot.org

To:  Multiple recipients of list AROID-L <aroid-l@mobot.org>
cc:  (bcc: Bonaventure W Magrys/ADM/SHU)

Subject:  Re: Cultivar registration

I can see that there is a big misunderstanding about what a cultivar
registrar is supposed to do. First of all, parentage is not required
information, although there will be space for this information (if known) on
the registration form. We may have some dynomite clone that needs to be
registered and not know a thing about its lineage. The plant will still be
registered even if nothing is known about how it arose. There may be
misidentification of one or both parents, so why bother with recording
lineages unless every plant that contributed to the cultivar has been
properly identified. This will never happen, folks! There is no verification
of orchid hybrids simply because there is no way to identify hybrids, and it
is the same with aroids. I am sure to get plants submitted for registration
that have incorrectly identified parents. I will just have to register what I

Secondly, it is not up to the registrar to make any value judgements about
what is good and acceptable and what is a lousy cultivar. That responsibilty
belongs to the breeder or registrant or whoever is submitting the plant for
cultivar status. If a person wants to have a legacy of registering worthless
material, that is their choice. [[[[[[[[[[[[Registering does not mean bringing
to the public eye, a good clone may come out of that cross later,  then
after it
is named as a cultivar and judged worthy everyone interested or wanting to
promote it will then use that information of its merit - BWM ]]]]]]]]]The only
choice a registrar makes if whether
there is enough evidence to support accepting or rejecting the cultivar, so
in some cases questionable material may be evaluated by another party if
needed. The registrar makes no independent decision about whether the clone
is "worthy". This kind of judging is not the authority or responsibility of
the registrar.

I think if the IAS is concerned about quality control, then there will need
to be another process for evaluating any registered cultivars, such as a
judging program. I will just be keeping the cultivar records, making sure the
submitted names are appropriate and comply with the Code, and publishing
checklists and Registers. As long as the required information and fee is
submitted and the rules of naming are followed, then a cultivar will probably
get registered.
[[[[[[[[What about if we start making intergenerics. Since we don't require
exact parent (species) background, do we have to bother with genus? Also, whats
great for an Alocasia may not be as noticable in a Pinellia cultivar, yet are
all the Pinallias going to be deemed less worthy? - BWM]]]]]]]]]]]]]

Donna Atwood
Selby Gardens

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index