hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] Comments on small lot seed imports - U. S.

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Comments on small lot seed imports - U. S.
  • From: "Tropical Plant Resource" <Tropicals@SolutionsAnalysis.net>
  • Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 16:46:41 -0400
  • Thread-index: AcQvrZw451SQ6YZvSP2kcJ4Kh7SmoAAD6Ukg

THANK YOU GARY.  Well worth the read...Christian

AlterNative Solutions Tropical / Desert Plant Resource
http://www.solutionsanalysis.net/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi 

-----Original Message-----
From: aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu [mailto:aroid-l-owner@lists.ncsu.edu] On
Behalf Of G. D. M.
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 2:18 PM
To: aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu
Subject: [aroid-l] Comments on small lot seed imports - U. S.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "G. D. M." <doji@interpac.net>
To: <aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: [aroid-l] Comments on small lot seed imports - U. S.


> >From the Pacific Bulb Society's mailing lists that I received today is
the following letter that could be of benefit to us all in the U. S.

In the above reference, I did not mean to say that the new regulation would
only be a benefit, there are also down sides to the way it is written.  As I
stated on another list "this looks like it was written by bean counters, not
bean growers".

I have also wallowed through all of the references contained in the
proposal, and if you would like, I can post their web addresses to save
others time.

To go directly to the proposal:
http://www.regulations.gov/freddocs/04-09716.htm

Sorry if I gave the impression that we all should approve this proposal.
There is another, now permanent regulation, involving Japanese beetles that
was adopted because of only ONE comment in agreement, no opposition, with
the proposal and that was made by a state agency.  We are heard, and maybe
listened to, when we do comment.

Gary



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement