hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

[Fwd: Philodendron santa leopoldina]

  • Subject: [Fwd: Philodendron santa leopoldina]
  • From: Denis <denis@skg.com>
  • Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 18:54:43 -0600 (CST)

  • Subject: Re: Philodendron santa leopoldina
  • From: Denis <denis@skg.com>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 16:02:13 -0500
Dear Aroiders:

Santa leopoldiana could not ever be a mass produced plant for K-Mart or
Home Depot gardens centers. It would cost too much and it has value only
as a collectible to someone who knows plants. If it were to be done(If
it could be done)it would probably be very slow to grow in bottles and
slow to grow in pots and at best be limited to 1000 or less units of
production. No real production nursery would even want this slow-slow,
spindly ugly duckling of a Phily. There is no way to justify the bench
space being tied up for so long.

But of course that's not stopped me from filling up 4 (6 x 92 foot)
benches with collectible stuff (some of dubious quality) for
breeding/propagation purposes.  I'd do it just to say we tried if we can
find a lab to take on the project.

Denis at Silver Krome Gardens, 
Homestead Florida

Floral Artistry wrote:
> While I do not have this prized plant, I would like to put my input here.
> First, plants that are endangered are because of either human ignorance or
> greed. Second, if a plant can be tissue cultured, why not? Third, if I were
> to spend $600. on a plant, I would like to be able to increase it's numbers
> so as to protect my investment. And the best way to do this is tissue
> culture. We have the modern technology to save nearly everything on the
> planet (I said nearly).
> Tissue culture is the best way to ensure species perpetuation. I don't agree
> that $600. after tissue culture become $5.00 K-Mart plants. That is also
> pure ignorance. If a rare and endangered plant can be propagated in tissue
> culture, then the people propagating should have enough sense to know the
> value of the product. With TC, the plants can be offered for a fair market
> value, $150.00 -$200.00 and still be a very desirable plant.
> I have several plants that are in dire need of tissue culture; if there are
> any peoples out there who have a reputable and honest lab, let me know. I
> will contact them. But, once these plants are cultured, I'm not going to
> knock them out for $5.00 a pop. They will be greatly reduced in price but
> the market value is still there.
> And if you have a plant that is as desirable as the one we are speaking and
> you donate a plant for TC, then you should be entitled to a portion of the
> proceeds. That is only fair. I would demand the same if I were to give up my
> plant.
> John Ingram
> jjingram@pacbell.net
> www.floralartistry.org

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index