Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:28:21 -0600
From: Christopher Rogers <email@example.com
Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Colour Pictures in Aroidiana
To: Discussion of aroids <firstname.lastname@example.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Speaking as an an editor of an international scientific journal and guest
editor for another, I
can answer that question (Derek, I hope you do not
mind my jumping in here . . .). Colour is very nice, very pretty, but has
drawbacks. There are actually a couple of reasons:
1) Cost. In the journals where I publish my research, black and white
images are free for the author to publish. Colour plates usually run
$300USD each. Do we pass that cost on to the authors? Well, yes, and
Aroidiana does just that. If you want to publish a colour picture, you must
bear the cost. If we require that all photograph submissions are in colour,
do we increase the cost of the journal? Will we lose subscriptions? If the
cost goes to the authors, will they then publish elsewhere, where the costs
are lower? By making this a requirement, we could harm the journal and the
IAS. And Aroidiana does publish colour on occasion (see volume 34) when the
authors will pay for it.
2) Detail. When preparing a scientific account, such as a
description, black & white photographs are often superior for the simple
reason that in a black and white image more detail is apparent. This is why
some famous photographers (such as Ansel Adams) chose to use black & white
film. Obviously, this is not a concern on our articles that are not of a
specifically taxonomic nature.
I hope that this is helpful. The role of the editor is not always obvious
or transparent to the readers.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:19 AM, E.Vincent Morano <email@example.com
> I sure hope Aroideana starts using color images. The 60's are long gone
> as should be black and whit photos with them. Ugh they are so ugly I mean,
> we are entering the second year of the second decade of the
> we should have nothing but hi definition color images now! Maybe even a few
> holograms haha.
> But seriously, my first book of Aroideana #34 was such a disappointment.
> Why would anyone use black and white film in this day and age? beyond that
> why would anyone even use film? Digital media is far superior. Aroideana
> could be very enjoyable if it wasnt for the black and whit images.
> *From:* Wilbert Hetterscheid <firstname.lastname@example.org
> *To:* 'Discussion of aroids' <email@example.com
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:29 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus ID
please. new species?
> This is a new species close to polyanthus. Will be published in next
> Aroideana is the plan.
> *Van:* firstname.lastname@example.org
] *Namens *E.Vincent Morano
> *Verzonden:* woensdag 16 november 2011 3:04
> *Aan:* Discussion of aroids
> *Onderwerp:* [Aroid-l] Amorphophallus ID please. new species?
> This was found at UBONRATCHATHANI province near Laos Can anyone ID it?
> Aroid-L mailing list
> Aroid-L mailing list
D. Christopher Rogers
Crustacean Taxonomist and Ecologist
Kansas Biological Survey
Kansas University, Higuchi Hall
2101 Constant Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66047-3759 USAhttp://www.kbs.ku.edu/http://www.kbs.ku.edu/directory/d-christopher-rogers/
Associate Editor, Journal of Crustacean Biologyhttp://www.thecrustaceansociety.org/
Vice President, Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate
Taxonomists SAFIT.ORG <http://safit.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...