hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum

  • Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum
  • From: "Peter Boyce" peterboyce@myjaring.net
  • Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 17:56:28 +0700

Hi Derek

Delighted to put something together.

Jade, Marble Queen, etc, etc are all selected cultivars of E. aureum.

Pete
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Derek Burch" <derek@horticulturist.com>
To: <aroid-l@lists.ncsu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:18 AM
Subject: Re: [aroid-l] Epipremnum


> Peter, a very loud and enthusiastic 'YES' to something on Epipremnum for
> Aroideana.  I am hoping that I can get Volume 27 put together in late
> spring so that, with the usual delays, the issue may be out in time for
> the show and sale in the fall. (Note to anyone panicking at seeing that
> number - Volume 26 is teetering on the edge of being ready - proofs are
> out, and I will stay on top of corrections - what I am doing here is
> soliciting for next year to anyone who feels inclined ...)
> 
> Could you clear something for us now? Are the cultivars "Jade" and
> 'Marble Queen" a part of Epipremnum aureum? My impression in growing
> them, as has come out before in these discussions, is that they have a
> "feel" to them that suggests that they are not. (Excuse me for getting
> technical!) They do seem to flip-flop from green to white variegation
> and back - or perhaps it is more that Marble Queen often goes green, but
> Jade rarely goes variegated.
> 
> Jade couldn't work for E. aureum, of course, if Jade and Marble Queen
> are distinct from E. aureum. If the Jade/Marble Queen pair are out of
> the running, do we even have a green plant that has come from E. aureum
> (green or variegated), in the trade as a selection - a requirement if it
> is to have a cultivar name? As you well know,you can't go popping a
> cultivar(CULTIvated VARiety)name on a plant in the wild. The definition
> is quite strict. 
> 
> One more point(repeating what has been said in previous discussions),
> our green ones in Florida don't appear to bloom any more often than the
> gold, for whatever reason.
> 
> The business of having the name attached to a 'weird' form, commonly
> grown in the trade, while a more normal creature exists in the wild is
> not unique to this case. If I remember correctly, there is a
> Clerodendrum whose diagnosis was based on double-flowered material, with
> a single form now known from the wild. And something similar came up
> with Erythrina variegata, but I have not dug out details on that
> recently. There must be many more.
> 
> Well, yes, all very suitable for Aroideana, I think. I will watch my
> mail.
> 
> Best wishes,  Derek
> 
> 





 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index