RE: Typhonium (giganteum) behaviour


On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, Wilbert Hetterscheid wrote:

> to this monster. And of course Typhonium venosum is an exception
> too..............
> 

Did anyone else notice how subtly Wilbert slipped this name change in on
us? (Not that we haven't been warned, several times.) Does this mean it's
official now? Sauromatum is no more? Did both species wind up in
Typhonium?

Ah well, a Sauromatum by any other name would smell as foul.

Steve

-- Steve Marak
-- samarak@arachne.uark.edu


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index