hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: [Aroid-l] Re: Colocasia mess

  • Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Re: Colocasia mess
  • From: "Peter Boyce" botanist@malesiana.com
  • Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:09:08 +0800

Colocasia fallax is a good species

----- Original Message ----- From: "mossytrail" <mossytrail@hctc.com>
To: <aroid-l@gizmoworks.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:24 PM
Subject: [Aroid-l] Re: Colocasia mess

Dear All,

I'm fed up with most of the botanists. I'm trying to sell
my plants under correct names, but... There are 2-4 names
for plants. Now please decide wich one is correct!
This is because in the early days of Linnaean nomenclature,
many species were known only from preserved or cultivated
specimens.  There was no way of knowing which of these
specimens could have interbred, nor of how much variation
the offspring would show, so each different variant had a
separate name.  In some cases, different specimens of a
single species were put in three or four different genera --
just try sorting out the synonymy of, for example, the
California fan palm, Washintonia filifera.

Colocasia antiquorum 'Illustris' cf. ? syn. Colocasia
esculenta 'Illustris'
Colocasia esculenta is the species.  It has three
subspecies, C. e. esculenta, C. e. antiquorum, and C. e.
aquatilis.  Anything with one of those last two as its
species name, is properly C. esculenta.
Colocasia esculenta (?var. ?subsp.) fallax cf. ? syn.
Colocasia fallax ? Colocasia fallax 'Silves Splash' ?
Colocasia esculenta 'Silves Splash' ? Colocasia fallax

Not sure whether C. fallax is a good species or not, but
since it, too, is here mixed up with C. esculenta, it is

I cannot speak of your other questions.

Jason Hernandez
Aroid-l mailing list

Aroid-l mailing list

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement