Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Subject: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: &* D* <p*@zoominternet.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:01:01 -0400
- List-archive: <http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/private/aroid-l>
|
Yes Christopher, a well thought out
statement. As a reviewer for many scientific journals in the area of ion
channel biology and a former associate editor for the American Journal
of Physiology: Cell Physiology, and someone that publishes a reasonable
number of manuscripts it is imperative that the person requesting more
scientific studies be published either do the science required or collaborate
with someone that is sufficiently knowledgeable to carry them out. If the
genera suggested have been published on extensively previously then there needs
to be some credible new science that advances the field significantly prior to
publication otherwise it is simply an anecdote and not worthy of
publication.
While ISI ratings are likely not critical to
Aroideana the published articles should still strive to be of the highest
scientific merit and thus, as pointed out, a critical review by atleast 2
experts in the field must be obtained and the authors must then rebut or address
the critiques of their work. If they can not address the critiques then
the manuscript should be rejected. If the initial submission is
clearly not scientifically sound it should be rejected outright with no chance
for revision. However, like any journal in any field of study the hottest
topics (dare I say sexiest) typically make it to press sooner and in larger
number as this is what the editors typically strive for to increase the impact
of their journal. Publishing articles that are not widely read is the
quickest way to destroy the impact of any journal.
As Christopher points out below someone
has to do the science and write up the results of the study and if the main
authors submitting their work for publication work in the area of tuberous
aroids then that is what subscribers to the journal should expect to
read.
So, who is going to write the next article on those
long climby thingies :o)
For those up north it is getting chilly.....maybe a
hot topic on global warming and how I will someday be able to have Philos
growing up the trunks of my trees outside here in zone 6a!!!!!
All the best,
Dan
Daniel C. Devor
Ion chanel biophysicist at large
Gibsonia, PA
|
_______________________________________________ Aroid-L mailing list Aroid-L@www.gizmoworks.com http://www.gizmoworks.com/mailman/listinfo/aroid-l
- References:
- Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- From: &* C* R* &*
- Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Prev by Date: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Next by Date: Re: [Aroid-l] Typhonium horsfieldi
- Previous by thread: Re: [Aroid-l] Aroideana
- Next by thread: [Aroid-l] Titan flowerings