[cg] The illusion of charity? An article on world hunger
- To: Penrod3@aol.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, KiwiUncle@aol.com, email@example.com, Jafd26@aol.com, Wilson761@aol.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, WRClement1@aol.com, email@example.com
- Subject: [cg] The illusion of charity? An article on world hunger
- From: Tetrad <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 08:10:47 -0400
I received this article from the United Church of Christ minister who
maintains an e-mail list on environmental issues. I thought it was quite
thought-provoking and worth further discussion.
Take the time to read it -- I found it very interesting and quite relevant
to the current social-political situation.
Dorene Pasekoff, Coordinator
St. John's Organic Community Garden
>> The illusion of charity?
>>by Sean Gonsalves, Cape Cod Times
>> March 30, 1999
>> A veil of ignorance shrouds public opinion about world hunger. The
>> conventional wisdom says: people who starve in this world are victims of
>> famine, foolishness and/or fascism.
>> That people starve because of personal and social foolishness is beyond
>> doubt. That people starve due to dictatorial policies is also not worth
>> about. But, what follows is likely to provoke "patriotic" pundits to
>> "Starvation is the characteristic of some people not having enough food to
>> eat. It is not the characteristic of there being not enough food to eat."
>> are the words of Amartya Sen, the Drummond professor
>> of political economy at Oxford University and fellow of
>> All Souls College.
>> In his insightful book, "Poverty and Famines: An Essay
>> on Entitlement and Deprivation," brother Sen's "careful
>> use of evidence...gives weight and substance to the
>> view that human institutions, in particular capitalist
>> institutions, rather than nature or the growth of
>> population, are responsible for famine and starvation,"
>> as one book-reviewer put it.
>> Sen's work is based on decades and decades of empirical study and
>> scholarly analysis. He is a former economics professor at the London School
>> of Economics, Stanford and Harvard. He was also a former visiting
>> economics professor at MIT.
>> That's no guarantee Sen's work is correct. But we're talking academic rigor
>> here. Reading Sen is worth the mental effort. That is, if you care to deepen
>> your knowledge of a problem haunting the lives of billions of our
>> In the world today, starvation depends not merely on food supply but on its
>> distribution, Sen points out. "If one person in eight starves regularly
>> world, this is seen as the result of his inability to establish
>> enough food; the question of the physical availability of the food is not
>> directly involved."
>> Sen analyzes the "theoretically unsound, empirically inept and dangerously
>> misleading" policies U.S. and other world "leaders" follow. He also gives a
>> detailed case-study analysis of recent famines, such as the Great Bengal
>> Famine of 1943 and the Ethiopian famines of 1973 and 1974.
>> About 34,000 children die every day because of hunger and easily treatable
>> diseases. According to a 1996 World Bank study, 1.3 billion people "live" in
>> grinding poverty, surviving (but-dying-slowly) on one dollar a day. Another 2
>> billion of God's children live in near-absolute poverty. Three billion
>> majority of the world's population, live on less than two dollars per day!
>> Yet, more than 200 million Americans consume enough food annually to feed
>> one billion people in poor nations. Oxford economist Donald Hay has
>> observed that a mere two percent of the world's grain harvest would be
>> enough, if shared, to eradicate hunger and malnutrition across the entire
>> Because the global economy operates according to the "free-market"
>> economic dogma that our leaders worship, American policy-makers have
>> played (and do play) a huge role in relation to world hunger.
>> Many Americans give to charity - maybe a turkey on Thanksgiving or money
>> to that organization Sally Struthers does PR work for. That is a good thing.
>> Many lives are saved because of charity.
>> But, so as to not become spiritually complacent and self-righteous, we need
>> to ask a tremendously important question: If poverty and hunger are often
>> caused by institutional arrangements (i.e. "welfare reform," NAFTA, World
>> Bank and International Monetary Fund policies), and the affluent benefit
>> materially from such economic injustice, then what true good does our
>> charity do?
>> Ever heard of the saying: Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day; teach
>> to fish, he'll eat forever? If contemporary social structures serve to
>> the undemocratic, plutocratic privilege of the relative few at the expense of
>> the many, then our charity is nothing more than a salve for our guilty
>> consciousness and food for our starving sanctimony.
>> A Brazilian slum resident, Iracema da Silva, writes: "Sometimes I think 'If I
>> die, I won't have to see my children suffering as they are.' Sometimes I even
>> think of killing myself. So often I see them crying, hungry; and there I am,
>> without a cent to buy them some bread. I think, 'My God, I can't face it!
>> end my life. I don't want to look any more!' "
>> Those aren't the words of a woman who wants a "free lunch." It is the despair
>> of the dispossessed, lacking true liberty - a reality propagandists call
>> "free-market" capitalism.
>> Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff writer and syndicated
>> columinist. He can be reached via email: email@example.com
>> Copyright © 1998 Cape Cod Times. All rights reserved.
community_garden maillist - firstname.lastname@example.org