Re: How organic is your garden?
- Subject: Re: [cg] How organic is your garden?
- From: O* G* C* T*
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 14:30:38 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: <D*@aol.com> To: <j*@casagarden.com>; <community_garden@mallorn.com> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:39 PM Subject: Re: [cg] How organic is your garden? Thanks to those who have
contributed to this subject so far
In Christchurch, New Zealand,
we are facing exactly this issue.
I am currently employed to do
two jobs, one as advocate for our community gardens association, the other to
administer and promote a new organic certification scheme for small scale
organic producers. The two dovetail nicely.
The cert scheme works by
conducting peer reviews in grower groups of about 4 each...
Several community gardens (who
grow high quality, wonderful food, and who are doing great things in terms of
improving their local environments, not to mention building community etc) came
on board with the scheme (the pilot was funded by our Ministry of Agriculture
and forestry).
Several issues have started to
appear, all of which are specific to community gardens as their key 'function'
is in serving the community and not in being 'certified organic'.
Community gardens typically
accept free plants from nurseries that are not organic (recently hundreds of
vegetable plants were funnelled out through the network, given to one group by
their local nursery). No garden would really consider saying 'no, sorry, it's
not organic', since what they want to do is a) grow as many veggies as possible
and b) build trusting networks with local businesss. This will impact on their
ability to gain a certification.
Gardens are also donated other
materials from the community that may cause a problem in terms of organic
integrity.
Someone may make a mistake with
the compost, someone may use blood and bone on the raised bed... whatever.
Slight transgressions of this sort are usually accepted by gardens because they
are opportunities for education, and for confidence building etc... But they
would cause problems for certification.
I think this is a very
interesting area for community gardens to think about, and one that we are
struggling with.
It may be that we decide to
give qualfied certifications, that acknowledge the good work being done, while
also acknowledging the special characteristics of community gardens. And maybe
some gardens can be fully certified.
One suggestion has been that
certifications could be granted if community garden reps attend a given number
of community workshops that touch on specific issues that community gardens
address in these regards.
Any thoughts would be most
welcome
Best
regards
Matt Morris
Christchurch Community Gardens
Association
NZ
> Hi, Jim, > > You raise some good questions about 'organic' as a standard. There are a > couple of ways to look at the issue. One is to consider the ecological and > biological side of 'organics'. The other is to realize that the term > 'organic' (acknowledging our unquestioned debt to Organic Gardening Magazine > and the Rodale family, who coined the phrase) is not a scientific definition, > but part inspiring slogan and part marketing device. > > > The problem is... we extensively mulch our garden from the City of > > Huntsville's leaf collection program. We use 2 year old mulch to > completely > > mulch our garden...Even though we use > > organic fertilizers and pest management, the use of the mulch will disallow > > us to state the fact that "Yes, we operate an organic garden".You see, > > because we don't know if the collected leaves have been sprayed with any > > toxic chemicals or the yards where they orginate have been sprayed with > > toxic chemicals (fertilizers, weed killers, etc.), that is the problem. > You > > are either completely organic or you are not. One or the other. > > On the bio-ecological side, most of pesticides and fertilizers used in yards > are, to the biochemist, 'organic' (carbon based). This means that the right > microbe can break them down. In a well-run municipal composting operation > (like Huntsville's?), leaf-based composts are probably very low in residues > thanks to the composting critters. Even 'fresh' mulches are probably pretty > dilute, since they are made from leaf drop. You can test the mulch and > compost to verify this. > > On the 'practical' side, some organic certification agencies allow use of > municipal leaf composts in light of their low residue, and because this > important soil building resource would otherwise end up in the landfill or be > burned, both terrible decisions ecologically. See what the federal organic > standards say, and check with your local certifiers to see what they allow. > > > I never heard anyone say "Yes, we are 95 % organic". Thats like someone > > saying, "I feel that since I only smoke 1 cigarette a day, I'm 95 % > > smoke-free". Yeah, right! > > Actually, there are 'transition' categories for farmers in the process of > moving to 'organic' status on farms. You could make part of your garden > 'fully organic', while using leaf mulch on the rest (if the leaf mulch isn't > acceptable as 'organic') and making that part 'sustainable/ecologically > managed'. > > In my opinion, sustainability and ecological soundness are more fundamental > than 'being certified organic'. Are you building and protecting your soil? > Are you being very careful about how you use any concentrated form of > nutrient or biocide, whether its origin is 'chemical' or 'organic'? Are you > considering and strengthening the ecosystems and natural communities that > border and interpenetrate your garden - for example, by creating habitat and > encouraging native plants at least along the borders of the garden? Are you > building community with your human neighbors? Does it make sense to turn away > a senior citizen who loves to garden, simply because she wants to slip her > tomatoes a little 5-10-10? These are the key issues, more than seeking the > appealing sounding label 'organic'. > > Though I think using municipal leaf mulch or compost on community gardens is > a great idea, you might want to check Elaine Ingham's work on suitability of > different composts to different purposes, based on the 'feedstock' and > microbial makeup of the compost. Second, do be careful if grassclippings are > included in your municipal compost or mulch blend. Some new herbicides used > on lawns are horribly toxic to legumes and reportedly can persist, even > through composting, to kill off your peas and beans. > > Though it would take more effort, you could mobilize your volunteers to > collect your own mulch by picking up bags of leaves from yards that don't > spray, and then aging and composting them yourselves at the garden. Local > waste-reduction programs (often sponsored by county engineering departments) > may be delighted to help do this. > > Good luck! Keep building that soil, son, you're doing good. > > Don Boekelheide > Charlotte NC > > > > Best regards, Jim Call, CASA Community Garden > > Volunteer Director > > www.casagarden.com > > ______________________________________________________ > The American Community Gardening Association listserve is only one of ACGA's services to community gardeners. To learn more about the ACGA and to find out how to join, please go to http://www.communitygarden.org > > > To post an e-mail to the list: community_garden@mallorn.com > > To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your subscription: https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/community_garden Organic Garden City Trust
PO Box 327 Christchurch ph (03) 365 5038 Fax (03) 379 2250 o*@environment.org.nz http://members.tripod.com/OGCT/index.htm |
- Prev by Date: FW: [cancommgardens] soil decontamination / geotextile membrane
- Next by Date: Re: FW: [cancommgardens] soil decontamination / geotextile membrane
- Previous by thread: FW: [cancommgardens] soil decontamination / geotextile membrane
- Next by thread: please remove me from the mail list