hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: community_garden digest, Vol 1 #1325 - 1 msg

  • Subject: [cg] Re: community_garden digest, Vol 1 #1325 - 1 msg
  • From: David Peterson dayvidmp@yahoo.com
  • Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:26:28 -0800 (PST)

Thanks for your support Adam. We down in Austin - Bush country - had an antiwar rally of ten thousand yesterday, and are gathering our only encouragement from rallies like the ones across the world. I suppose we should return to talking about gardens soon, but I wanted to add my two cents. Best of luck in New York.

-David Peterson

 community_garden-admin@mallorn.com wrote:


Send community_garden mailing list submissions to
community_garden@mallorn.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/community_garden
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
community_garden-request@mallorn.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
community_garden-admin@mallorn.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of community_garden digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Letter from New York - Admittedly Off Topic (adam36055@aol.com)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: Adam36055@aol.com
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:00:09 EST
To: community_garden@mallorn.com
CC: cybergardens@treebranch.com
Subject: [cg] Letter from New York - Admittedly Off Topic

Friends,

Most of you have probably heard President Bush and Secretary Powell's recent
speeches. They have been broadcasted all over the media, and they are well
crafted pieces of work. These speeches are written by wordsmiths like me,
who either believe their content or are satisfied with the dollars and
"access." However, I disagree with their content and this "rush to war." I
know terrorism first hand, know war, and have met Kurds and Iraqis in my
neighborhood who hate Saddam's regieme - and they are right. However,
everything combined, as it stands, despite all of President Bush's &
Secretary Powell's semi-smoking guns, this is not a causus bellum - at
least, not the way that the United States should go to war.

When my wife and I join other New Yorkers, in front of the United Nations in
a few hours, to protest President's Bush's rush to war, I will have a copy of
Senator Byrd's speech in my pocket. I will undoubtedly see many community
gardeners there with me.

Best wishes,

Adam Honigman


Senate Floor Speech by US Senator Robert Byrd - Wednesday, February 12, 2003

To contemplate war is to think about the most horrible of human experiences.

On this February day, as this nation stands at the brink of battle, every
American on some level must be contemplating the horrors of war.
Yet, this Chamber is, for the most part, silent -- ominously, dreadfully
silent.  There is no debate, no discussion, no attempt to lay out for the
nation the pros and cons of this particular war.  There is nothing.
We stand passively mute in the United States Senate, paralyzed by our own
uncertainty, seemingly stunned by the sheer turmoil of events. Only on the
editorial pages of our newspapers is there much substantive discussion of
the prudence or imprudence of engaging in this particular war.
And this is no small conflagration we contemplate.  This is no simple
attempt to defang a villain.  No.  This coming battle, if it materializes,
represents a turning point in U.S. foreign policy and possibly a turning
point in the recent history of the world.

This nation is about to embark upon the first test of a revolutionary
doctrine applied in an extraordinary way at an unfortunate time.  The
doctrine of preemption -- the idea that the United States or any other
nation can legitimately attack a nation that is not imminently threatening
but may be threatening in the future -- is a radical new twist on the
traditional idea of self defense.  It appears to be in contravention of
international law and the UN Charter.  And it is being tested at a time of
world-wide terrorism, making many countries around the globe wonder if they
will soon be on our -- or some other nation's -- hit list.  
 
High level Administration figures recently refused to take nuclear weapons
off of the table when discussing a possible attack against Iraq. What could
be more destabilizing and unwise than this type of uncertainty, particularly
in a world where globalism has tied the vital economic and security
interests of many nations so closely together?  There are huge cracks
emerging in our time-honored alliances, and U.S. intentions are suddenly
subject to damaging worldwide speculation. Anti-Americanism based on
mistrust, misinformation, suspicion, and alarming rhetoric from U.S. leaders
is fracturing the once solid alliance against global terrorism which existed
after September 11.

Here at home, people are warned of imminent terrorist attacks with little
guidance as to when or where such attacks might occur.  Family members are
being called to active military duty, with no idea of the duration of their
stay or what horrors they may face.  Communities are being left with less
than adequate police and fire protection.  Other essential services are also
short-staffed.  The mood of the nation is grim.  The economy is stumbling.
Fuel prices are rising and may soon spike higher.

This Administration, now in power for a little over two years, must be
judged on its record.  I believe that that record is dismal.
In that scant two years, this Administration has squandered a large
projected surplus of some $5.6 trillion over the next decade and taken us to
projected deficits as far as the eye can see.  This Administration's
domestic policy has put many of our states in dire financial condition,
under funding scores of essential programs for our people.  This
Administration has fostered policies which have slowed economic growth.

This Administration has ignored urgent matters such as the crisis in health
care for our elderly.  This Administration has been slow to provide adequate
funding for homeland security.  This Administration has been reluctant to
better protect our long and porous borders.

In foreign policy, this Administration has failed to find Osama bin Laden.
 I n fact, just yesterday we heard from him again marshaling his forces and
urging them to kill.  This Administration has split traditional alliances,
possibly crippling, for all time, International order-keeping entities like
the United Nations and NATO.  This Administration has called into question
the traditional worldwide perception of the United States as
well-intentioned, peacekeeper.  

This Administration has turned the patient art of diplomacy into threats,
labeling, and name calling of the sort that reflects quite poorly on the
intelligence and sensitivity of our leaders, and which will have
consequences for years to come.

Calling heads of state pygmies, labeling whole countries as evil,
denigrating powerful European allies as irrelevant -- these types of crude
insensitivities can do our great nation no good.  We may have massive
military might, but we cannot fight a global war on terrorism alone.  We
need the cooperation and friendship of our time-honored allies as well as
the newer found friends whom we can attract with our wealth.  Our awesome
military machine will do us little good if we suffer another devastating
attack on our homeland which severely damages our economy.  Our military
manpower is already stretched thin and we will need the augmenting support
of those nations who can supply troop strength, not just sign letters
cheering us on.

The war in Afghanistan has cost us $37 billion so far, yet there is evidence
that terrorism may already be starting to regain its hold in that region.
 We have not found bin Laden, and unless we secure the peace in Afghanistan,
the dark dens of terrorism may yet again flourish in that remote and
devastated land.

Pakistan as well is at risk of destabilizing forces.  This Administration
has not finished the first war against terrorism and yet it is eager to
embark on another conflict with perils much greater than those in< BR>Afghanistan.  Is our attention span that short?  Have we not learned that
after winning the war one must always secure the peace?

And yet we hear little about the aftermath of war in Iraq.  In the absence
of plans, speculation abroad is rife.  Will we seize Iraq's oil fields,
becoming an occupying power which controls the price and supply of that
nation's oil for the foreseeable future?  To whom do we propose to hand the
reigns of power after Saddam Hussein?

Will our war inflame the Muslim world resulting in devastating attacks on
Israel?  Will Israel retaliate with its own nuclear arsenal?  Will the
Jordanian and Saudi Arabian governments be toppled by radicals, bolstered by
Iran which has much closer ties to terrorism than Iraq?
Could a disruption of the world's oil supply lead to a world-wide recession?
 
Has our senselessly bellicose language and our callous disregard of the

interests and opinions of other nations increased the global race to join
the nuclear club and made proliferation an even more lucrative practice for
nations which need the income?

In only the space of two short years this reckless and arrogant
Administration has initiated policies which may reap disastrous consequences
for years.

One can understand the anger and shock of any President after the savage
attacks of September 11.  One can appreciate the frustration of having only
a shadow to chase and an amorphous, fleeting enemy on which it is nearly
impossible to exact retribution.

But to turn one's frustration and anger into the kind of extremely
destabilizing and dangerous foreign policy debacle that the world is
currently witnessing is inexcusable from any Administration charged with the
awesome power and responsibility of guiding the destiny of the greatest
superpower on the planet.  Frankly many of the pronouncements made by this
Administration are outrageous.  There is no other word.

Yet this chamber is hauntingly silent.  On what is possibly the eve of
horrific infliction of death and destruction on the population of the nation
of Iraq -- a population, I might add, of which over 50% is under age 15 --
this chamber is silent.  On what is possibly only days before we send
thousands of our own citizens to face unimagined horrors of chemical and
biological warfare -- this chamber is silent.  On the eve of what could
possibly be a vicious terrorist attack in retaliation for our attack on
Iraq, it is business as usual in the United States Senate.

We are truly "sleepwalking through history."  In my heart of hearts I pray
that this great nation and its good and trusting citizens are not in for a
rudest of awakenings.

To engage in war is always to pick a wild card.  And war must always be a
last resort, not a first choice.  I truly must question the judgment of any
President who can say that a massive unprovoked military attack on a nation
which is over 50% children is "in the highest moral traditions of our
country".  This war is not necessary at this time.  Pressure appears to be
having a good result in Iraq.  Our mistake was to put ourselves in a corner
so quickly.  Our challenge is to now find a graceful way out of a box of our
own making.  Perhaps there is still a way if we allow more time.







--__--__--

______________________________________________________
The American Community Gardening Association listserve is only one of ACGA's services to community gardeners. To learn more about the ACGA and to find out how to join, please go to http://www.communitygarden.org

To post an e-mail to the list: community_garden@mallorn.com

To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your subscription: https://secure.mallorn.com/mailman/listinfo/community_garden


End of community_garden Digest



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index