hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: FW: Suggested Comment Letter on Proposed National OrganicStandards

> > (3) So-called "natural foods" with less than 50% organic
> ingredients should
> > not be allowed to use the word "organic" anywhere on their package or
> > product labels--given that the the non-organic ingredients of these
> > so-called "natural" products may be genetically engineered, irradiated,
> > derived from sewage sludge, or produced with pesticides, growth
> hormones,
> > or antibiotics.

50%?? Hold them to the ethic that organic represents. 100% = organic,

A product with 95% organic can = 5% genetically modified, chemicalized,
irradiated. What have we gained with that?

community_garden maillist  -  community_garden@mallorn.com

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index