hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Scotts Company & USBG

We must be careful not to turn the audience off before they hear the
message.   I often find myself doing that.   Your points are well taken
and sharp witted!

On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 14:34:33 -0600 "Laura McKenzie"
<laurabrownmckenzie@worldnet.att.net> writes:
>   Please believe me when I say my reply to you wasn't an
>attack but a stance.  You are beginning to take it personally.
>I'm sorry.
>      First, since you don't know me, you don't know that I try
>very hard not to drive at all and since we're doing our best to
>get our garden to the point where I can grow all our food
>except grains (we're vegetarians), I won't even need a grocery
>store soon. And yes, everyone including me needs to stop
>driving our cars around as much as we do. We live a good
>distance out in the country and since I homeschool my children
>and don't have a second income, we're careful about driving for
>more reasons than one.  I always call my friends and offer to
>do their shopping for them "in town" so the driving is reduced
>and mostly my husband picks up everything on his way home from
>    Second, Scotts is a villianous company. Sorry if saying
>that offends you.  They are and they know they are. A spade is
>a spade no matter how much money it contributes to our economy
>or to charities.  A better point than mine was the one about
>the mindless cartoonish commercials out there that make folks
>feel safe and secure in using whatever they want however they
>want to in their gardens. Since I personally have a friend who
>is dying of advanced breast cancer and has a husband with
>non-hodgkins lymphoma and a daughter with brain tumors, I have
>seen devestation wreaked by Scotts and other companies.  Get
>these companies talking and eventually they'll start talking
>numbers and "acceptable risk". Seeing my friend and her family
>makes me feel there is no acceptable risk. (Likely their
>problems stem from living beside a place that is consistently
>and heavily sprayed with herbicides... there are studies by
>respectable institutions if you want to read them.)
>     Lastly,  I'm not hating everyone who uses weed be gone or
>whatever. I am offering a free alternative and help for anyone
>not wanting to hurt others and themselves by giving money to
>chemical companies.   The attitude " just a little won't hurt"
>is generated directly by the company you are defending. I don't
>blame you or other consumers for believing their line. They
>spend millions on advertising to convince you and I'm just one
>       I personally depend on compost tea for just about every
>ill in my garden that good soil can't take of and it works just
>fine. If it doesn't, I wasn't meant to grow that plant this
>year.   If anyone wants compost tea recipes just write me!   If
>suggesting that we make compost tea and mulch and not spend our
>money on Scotts brand products makes enemies of them, then so
>be it. They were enemies to start with as far as I'm concerned.
>(Keep in mind my friends.) There is a time to say "no" and I've
>said it.
>Dawn wrote:
>    Every dumb worker is not responsible for the company
>representative who
>suggested playing in Diazinon.
>Very few people can follow directions; people who won't read
>and abide
>by directions should all become organic gardeners.    And we
>all take anyone else's word for safety!   However, villianizing
>isn't going to turn this world around and it will make enemies
>environmentalists will have to subdue before we can accomplish
>   We need to take this serious task one step at a time.
>Ants are important in improving the soil in the low desert.
>creature has an important job to do.     Perhaps the thing to
>do is
>educate people about the role ants play in improving the soil.
>also eat termites!
>Gasoline is poluting our air; why don't you walk everywhere you
>Perhaps it is inconvienent to take your idealism that far?
>community_garden maillist  -  community_garden@mallorn.com

community_garden maillist  -  community_garden@mallorn.com

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index