hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

RE: An i for an i

  • Subject: RE: [ferns] An i for an i
  • From: "Winter, Wim de" Wim.dewinter@wur.nl
  • Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:36:56 +0100
  • Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
  • Thread-index: AcTrW+geU33O6Xo7TP2CcD8dOBiD7gAq2PVS
  • Thread-topic: [ferns] An i for an i

Both names occur in scientific literature. In Edie's Ferns of HongKong it's a
single "i". Tropicos lists the double "ii", though with the remark that Ching
spelled it as "Championi". I suppose that single "i", though Bentham
originally published it that way, is now considered a typographical error that
according to the Rules should be corrected.

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-ferns@hort.net on behalf of Tom Stuart
Sent:	Sun 12/26/2004 3:48 PM
To:	ferns@hort.net
Subject:	[ferns] An i for an i
The Asian fern Dryopteris championii is listed 108 times in a google, while
D.championi gets 33 adherents. Which is right?

The earliest name is usually given:
> Aspidium championi Benth.; Fl. Hongk. 456 (1861)
refering to the Flora Hongkongiensis of George Bentham, for which a brief

This site,
tells us:
> His eight volume opus, Flora Hongkongensis (1861) was partially based
> on 500 to 600 species of phaenogamous [flowering] plants and ferns
> placed in his hands by John George Champion on his return to England in
> 1851. The volumes firmly contradicted first impressions of Hong Kong as
> a barren rock as few islands contain as varied or extensive a flora
> as Hong Kong. Many plants in Hong Kong today thanks to George, thus
> bear as part of their moniker Championii.

But wait, it is not so simple. The Flora of China checklist cites the
the first name used, as:
> #Asplenium championi Benth.
> Flora Hongkongensis 456. 1861.
Asplenium seems improbable, even in mid-nineteenth century, particularly
because nomenclature was based largely (even solely by some taxonomists)
on the shape and position of the sorus. As you can see below, the sorus is
not asplenoid. Still, Aspidium or Asplenium, we have but one i.

The source for the move to Dryopteris was the Chinese pteridologist R.C.
Ching. Here is the FoC checklist citation:

> Dryopteris championii (Benth.) C. Chr. ex Ching, Sinensia 3(12): 327. 1931.

This Flora of China Checklist entry also gives an annotation "as championi".
Though I don't have the Fl. Hongk. there can be no doubt championi is the

William Stern (Botanical Latin), citing the International Code of Botanical
Nomenclature, lists many rules for Latinization, among them,
> When the name ends in a consonant, the letters ii are added, except
> when the name ends in -er when i is added.

So, championi was first used, but according to the rules, mis-applied.
Will anyone stand up for championi?

Now that I've made you wade through all this, the best diagnostic photos of
our taxon on the web are here:

There is no easy way to get there from Google using an English query. (When
viewing Japanese pages, a more-presentable version results from changing
the browser encoding; for example, in Internet Explorer:

Goggle has recently added translation of Japanese. Here is your goggle giggle
for today:

Speaking of Dryopteris, a number of fern web sites linked to the monograph on
the genus at the Natural History Museum site. In February the proprietor,
Los Angeles County, evicted Botany, and those links have been dead ever since.
It is back now at Rancho Santa Ana:

A Happy New Year to Rancho Santa Ana, and a lump of coal for Los Angeles.

Tom Stuart
P.S. The i's have it. I am indebted to Sue Olsen for raising the question.

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat]

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement