Re: ferns DIGEST V1 #235 Spore request

---

• Subject: [ferns] Re: ferns DIGEST V1 #235 Spore request
• From: "Brian Swale" b*@caverock.net.nz
• Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:28:21 +1300
• In-reply-to: <200510270401.j9R411v09937@lorien.mallorn.com>

Hi all

David wrote
> 
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:46:35 EDT
> From: XericFerns@aol.com
> Subject: Re: AW: [ferns] Spore request
> 
> Frank, 
> 
> Thanks. Yes, Cosentinia vellea would be classed as a xeric fern. I  plan to
> pursue the German link and see what I can come up with.
> 
> David Schwartz

I am curious to know why the name Consentinia is used when for example, 
> Cosentinia Tod.  Giornale de Scienze Naturali ed Economiche de Palermo 1: 219. 1866.
{Giorn. Sci. Nat. Econ. Palermo ; BPH 403.22}

is considered, for example at MOBOT, 
(http://mobot.mobot.org/W3T/Search/vast.html)

to be superseded by Cheilanthes Sw.

Thanks, Brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE FERNS

• Prev by Date: Re: AW: Spore request
• Next by Date: Re: Re: ferns DIGEST V1 #235 Spore request
• Previous by thread: Re: AW: Spore request
• Next by thread: Re: Re: ferns DIGEST V1 #235 Spore request