hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: Fwd: Hofstra show

In a message dated 04/19/2005 9:30:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
gossiper@sbcglobal.net writes:
I always thought herbaceous meant non-woody. At first I thought bulbous
plants shouldn't be considered. But they really don't break it down farther
than woody and herbaceous.... and they do go dormant or die off to the root
system, they don't have secondary growth, but somehow it just doesn't seem

Can you make a bulbous section and avoid the problem?
That's what I always do - the usual practice - but this show didn't
do it that way.  I am evaluating the Horticulture Division for an award,
and don't know whether to consider this a fault or not.  I just don't
understand why they did it that way.

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement