Re: Viburnum > foundation
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: [CHAT] Viburnum > foundation
- From: A*@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:41:39 EST
When we bought this house in 1970 we had to remove two Douglas firs in front
and
a Colorado blue spruce in back that had been planted as foundation plantings
when
the house was buile 20 years earlier. Cost a fortune to get them taken down,
but
you could hardly get in the front door, and all of them overshadowed the
roof. Can't
blame this on a 'developer.' The old man who built the house put them
there, and
was very proud of their growth. He was mad as a wet hen when he saw that we
had taken them down.
Auralie
In a message dated 02/26/2005 9:34:41 AM Eastern Standard Time,
kmrsy@comcast.net writes:
I don't know about today's new home landscaping, but sometimes, isn't it
a scream what was chosen for the second-hand home you bought? My house
had just one of those small preformed cement things for a porch with a
wrought iron railing on it. They had placed a yew next to it, which over
20 years had gotten out of scale with the porch, maybe 6x6, and
previously hacked at willy-nilly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index