Re: ponds
- To: g*@hort.net
- Subject: Re: [CHAT] ponds
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:09:19 EST
In a message dated 1/29/04 9:47:16 AM, TeichFlora@aol.com writes:
<< The law is that anything deeper than
18" is considered a swimmingpool and must be fenced, 18" and under is
considered a water feature. >>
Noreen, this is the same rqmt as our area, thus, my pond is 18". Acreages are
rqd to fence here the same as smaller lots. I hadn't thought about the many
business/commerical ponds & fountains which are not fenced here either. Many
of these water bodies are functional as well as add beauty.
A nearby suburb has revamped their business area adding very attractive,
small fountains. Someone keeps adding soap which creates a real problem.
Ceres
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
http://www.hort.net/funds/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index