hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive


I think Gene's right for many magazines out there.  I only get Fine
Gardening (FG), Horticulture(H), and The American Gardener  (TAG), all of
which have a mix of long and short articles.  I like some of the short bits
like HortJournal in H, but not particularly thrilled with the regional
essays that both H & FG have taken up.    Many short articles ".... where
features are about 5 to 600 words long...." tell you about as much as you'd
find in a good reference; they don't get into the real nitty-gritty, the
secrets that people like Gene have to share.  Many short ones leave me with
unanswered questions, but at least they may spark my interest.  H usually
does a single page article on a specific species of a plant each month and
since they're not trying to cover a whole genus, the page is often enough.

I think many of the newer magazines that have gone to shorts are following
the premise that readers want shorter articles.  That's all the time or
interest they have.  this may be true for readers of Ladies Home Journal and
People, but when you have a quality publication that caters to a specific
interest, the die-hard readers won't be satisfied with snipets.  We want to
know more.  RHS has some great in-depth articles; wish I could afford it.

I never see any of these mags in a waiting room - I always bring mine with

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Bush" <genebush@otherside.com>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CHAT]TAG

> Hello Lynda and Nora...
>     Thanks for the complements on my article ... appreciate you saying so.
> The American Gardener magazine is one of the few good ones left out there
> my opinion. Most have gone over to the byte articles, or gardening
> personalities instead of depth.... where features are about 5 to 600 words
> long....  still like my in-depth articles that run a minimum of 1500 words
> with photos and side bars added.
>     They are pretty easy to work with.....
>     Gene E. Bush
> Munchkin Nursery & Gardens, llc
> www.munchkinnursery.com
> genebush@munchkinnursery.com
> Zone 6/5  Southern Indiana
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lynda Young" <lyoung@grindertaber.com>
> > Gene - just got the magazine yesterday.  Read your article immediately.
> > It was wonderful!  Congratulations.
> >
> > Lynda
> > Zone 7 - West TN
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the

  • Follow-Ups:
  • References:
    • AG
      • From: "Lynda Young"
    • Re: TAG
      • From: "Gene Bush"

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement