Re: Shouldn't it be this way?

---

• To: <g*@hort.net>
• Subject: Re: [CHAT] Shouldn't it be this way?
• From: &* <k*@comcast.net>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:37:57 -0500
• References: <20040627135422.0E3817262@sitemail.everyone.net>

In a perfect world, yes.  I'd love to see it that way, but...
If what any particular candidate presents as a factual account of his
position and his past is not complete or accurate, it is helpful if someone
else points that out.

Here in Indiana, we have a man running for governor who I am not
particularly fond of.  However, I appreciate his integrity in asking his
party to remove negative comments about his opponent from the party website.
This man is trying to run a dignified campaign and I think that is
noteworthy.

Kitty

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dakota" <Dakota@hisword.com>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 8:54 AM
Subject: [CHAT] Shouldn't it be this way?


> One last word about politics. Shouldn't each candidate merely state what
> he believes, what he will do, etc. and not even mention the other
> candidates? Then, we should be presented with an accurate account of
> what each candidate has done in the past and let us decide the rest for
> ourselves. I have always hated this "but he has more dirt on his shoes
> than I do" type campaigns.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!
http://www.hort.net/funds/

• References:
  • Shouldn't it be this way?
    • From: D* &*

• Prev by Date: Re: now sunblock socks
• Next by Date: Re: Shouldn't it > houseplants
• Previous by thread: Shouldn't it be this way?
• Next by thread: Re: Shouldn't it > houseplants