hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: If you have already seen this - or are not a windowsuser- hit delete.

  • To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
  • Subject: Re: [CHAT] If you have already seen this - or are not a windowsuser- hit delete.
  • From: "Marge Talt" <mtalt@hort.net>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:42:46 -0400

Oh, Kitty...am I with you!  I am still using win95 and I love it,
except that my computer is maxed out of space and the BIOS won't take
any more drives or any bigger drives.  Our office workstation is
XP-Pro.  While there are one or two things I like about it, basically
I find it a royal pain in the derrihre because, as you point out,
things that were easy to get to and work with on 95 are now either
not accessible or so hidden you can't find them.  Plus I absolutely
loathe those *&^%$$ "cute" icons for help and other stuff and you
can't seem to get rid of them easily.  So much garbage for so little
real improvement IMO.

I have my computer set up exactly the way I like it; I have many
older programs I use daily.  I DO  NOT want to "upgrade", but I know
the handwriting is on the wall and it's only a matter of time and the
$$ needed for a new system...new printers, new scanners, new
everything as what I have - that works just fine - won't work with
XP...no drivers for same.....

Switching boxes means having hours and hours of time to move stuff,
not to mention getting used to new programs or having to find new
ones to replace what I now use or having to load those in their
backward compatible mode and not have all of them function
right...oh, do I dread it!  I started out with an 8086 running DOS in
1980...still have it; works fine but there's nothing that would
really run on it anymore.  Graduated to a borrowed box and win3.1 and
then got my whippy new system in '96 with win95...Not so whippy these

Marge Talt, zone 7 Maryland
Editor:  Gardening in Shade
Current Article: Battling Bambi
Complete Index of Articles by Category and Date
All Suite101.com garden topics :

> From: Kitty <kmrsy@comcast.net>
> I got my first computer in early 1995, started wit W3.1, then 95,
then 98.
> So i've probably been on a computer for a shorter length of time
than many
> of you.  However, during these 9 years it has been my impression
that while
> many programs/systems, offer more options than before, the writers
> decided the users are too dumb to know how to use them
intelligently.  So
> they have created wizards and 'help' files to get you through while
> everything that used to be out in the open from you.  They also
seem to feel
> that simple straight-forward layouts are boring and must be changed
> each new version.
> I'm not complaining about it all. Win95 was a great improvement.
But each
> new incarnation threw a bunch of crap like channels and stuff at
you that
> you had to deal with b4 you could get started. Now I look at XP in
> desktop and can't find anything.  I've never dealt with profile
options as
> I've been the only steady user on my computer at home or work.
> I guess I'm just sort of old school.  But I like things simple and
> accessible.  Like my 35mm camera.  I got a semi-automatic which
includes a
> manual override because I still want to control certain aspects of
> photo.  I love WordPerfect over Word.  One big advantage is "Reveal
> You can see the codes and know exactly where you are and what you
> changing.  I like older photo programs like Photoworks because
menus are
> laid out logically rather than with stupid qstns like "What would
you like
> to do?"
> Yes, I know I'll have to deal with a different platform one of
these days
> and I'll figure it out and adjust. I hope I'll be able to continue
> Photoworks and WP, though.
> Kitty

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement