hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
Gallery of Plants
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Mailing Lists
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
New Trillium species discovered

Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

RSS story archive

Re: NOW mini-mansions and disgust now municipal water

Jim: All of that makes perfect sense to me...under those conditions I
probably wouldn't vote for hooking up to municipal water either. Our
town is faced with a dilemma, however...our selurian acquifer, which is
the source of our shallower sandpoint wells, is contaminated with a
chemical called perchlorate, a byproduct of rocket
fuel/munitions/fertilizer manufacturing. At this point in time, only
half the town is contaminated...roughly the people on the south side of
Main street, which divides the town roughly in half. No scientist in
America is prepared to tell us that the other half will or won't become
contaminated over time, nor are they willing to tell us how long this
stuff will persist in the acquifer. Worst case scenario of this chemical
contaminant involves thryoid cancers, neurological toxicity to fetuses
resulting in learning disabilites, etc. So far there appears to be no
known health cluster of any identifiable kind in the residents, past or
current, of Hills, but data measurements have changed over the years so
this may not be reliably tracked, either. Please note that this is a
chemical that is not routinely tested for in water...a special test must
be done to detect it...you have to actively go looking for it to know it
is there. Problem #1 comes in that the Dept. of Defense is loathe to
have widespread testing of this done, as at one time perchlorate was
used as a stabilizing agent for the transport of uranium and plutonium
therefore the DOD feels that wholesale identification of perchlorate
contamination might potentially disclose locations of storage of these
nuclear chemicals to terrorists. Problem #2 comes in that the
aerojet/space industry and the DOD have routinely been taking rocket
fuel out and dumping it in vast quantity whenever they needed to get rid
of it, thinking it would just soak up into the ground and not be a
problem...major liability issues there. Anywhere you have an airforce
base, you have perchlorate contamination. problem #3: The folks at the
EPA tell me that onc

e perchlorate testing is done on a widescale basis across the nation, it
will probably result in much of the entire US' underground water supply
being contaminated in low levels with this...now isn't that a
frightening thought? All of Lake Mead and the Colorado river is
contaminated and as you know this is the source of irrigation for the
portion of the US that supplies a large % of the country's leafy green
vegetables ,especially lettuce whose cellular structure easily uptakes

So, in this case, I think this time, I will be voting yes for municipal
water. Have you had your well tested for perchlorate today? That's kind
of a catchy tune, don't you think? :-) I sometimes think I have to laugh
about this whole thing or I'd really be wanting to take a shotgun and
shoot whoever started dumping this stuff in the first place!

okay, I'm off **my** soapbox now...sorry folks!

Melody, IA (Z 5/4)

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious."    
--Albert Einstein

 --- On Thu 03/25, james singer < jsinger@igc.org > wrote:
From: james singer [mailto: jsinger@igc.org]
To: gardenchat@hort.net
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:31:07 -0500
Subject: Re: [CHAT] NOW mini-mansions and disgust

Zem has shamed me into it, so I guess it's time to fess up. I live in
<br>one of those areas that regularly votes down city water. And I vote
<br>with the majority. There are several reasons to reject city water
here, <br>not the least of which is you can strike water at about 10
feet or less <br>so wells are not all that expensive or mysterious or
difficult--just <br>stick a shovel in the ground and sweat a
little.<br><br>Second, the older subdivisions were not plumbed for city
water. If you <br>live in an older subdivision, as I do, and you vote
for "city" water <br>now, you're first assessed for bringing in the
mains from wherever the <br>closest connecting point is. That seems
reasonable--if you want it, pay <br>for it.<br><br>But it's not just a
water main they bring in or you will pay for. We <br>don't have
municipal sewerage in these subdivisions either, so when <br>they bring
in the water mains, they also bring in the sewer mains, <br>which only
makes sense--dig the street up once, piss the residents off
<br>once.<br><br>Except the rules are you've gotta hook up to both water
and sewage when <br>you hook up to one.<br>they're fiscally linked--you
pay for water by a yearly tax that <br>includes a sewer tax [the sewer
tax is based on water usage--doesn't <br>make sense--how many toilet
flushes equal watering a pear tree? but I <br>guess it's got to be based
on something].<br><br>But wait! They also lay grey water mains when
they've got the road dug <br>up, which also makes sense [if piping
reclaimed water in a separate <br>system makes sense. Someone has to
ask, "If it's re-claimed, why isn't <br>it potable?].<br><br>And when
you hook up to the city water and the city sewer, you're also
<br>required to hook up to the city grey water system. The upshot is you
<br>have to hire someone with a proper license to sort out your plumbing
<br>system, get all the proper permits, and pay off all the bureaucrats
so, <br>maybe, the right fluids go to the right place. Does anyone
remember the <br>movie "Brazil"?<br><br>

<br><br>A well and a septic tank--a proper distance one from another,
mind <br>you--meet the requirements of Occam's razor. And, perhaps more
<br>importantly, annual costs are in the hands of the public utility
<br>commission [electric wattage] and not in the hands of the local pols
<br>and their taxing authority.<br><br><br>On Thursday, March 25, 2004,
at 01:48 PM, Zemuly@aol.com wrote:<br><br>> In a message dated 3/25/2004
12:38:49 PM Central Standard Time,<br>> richa@midlands.net writes:<br>>
So now the town is repaying<br>> a $90,000 bond that was our part of the
new water system<br>> Sounds like us! When we first got our water system
everybody agreed to<br>> participate and no written contracts were drawn
up. Then when the <br>> system was up and<br>> ready to get connected
several families dug wells and refused to <br>> participate.<br>>
Apparently there's nothing the town can do about it, either. We did
<br>> get<br>> some codified rules regarding the water department and
passed an <br>> ordinance<br>> stating that should a property without
city water change ownership, <br>> whether through<br>> sale or death,
the new owner had to connect. That was the best we <br>> could do.<br>>
Those people do not pay anything -- not even a fire protection fee to
<br>> pay for<br>> the hydrants. If you are interested check out our
website: <br>> www.lagrangetn.com<br>><br>> zem<br>> zone 7<br>> West
Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!<br>>
http://www.hort.net/funds/<br>><br>><br>Island Jim<br>Southwest
hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!<br>


Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!

Support hort.net -- join the hort.net fund drive!

Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index

 © 1995-2017 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement