hort.net Seasonal photo, (c) 2006 Christopher P. Lindsey, All Rights Reserved: do not copy
articles | gallery of plants | blog | tech blog | plant profiles | patents | mailing lists | top stories | links | shorturl service | tom clothier's archive0
 Navigation
Articles
Gallery of Plants
Blog
Tech Blog
Plant Profiles
Patents
Mailing Lists
    FAQ
    Netiquette
    Search ALL lists
    Search help
    Subscription info
Top Stories
Links
sHORTurl service
Tom Clothier's Archive
 Top Stories
Disease could hit Britain's trees hard

Ten of the best snowdrop cultivars

Plant protein database helps identify plant gene functions

Dendroclimatologists record history through trees

Potato beetle could be thwarted through gene manipulation

Hawaii expands coffee farm quarantine

Study explains flower petal loss

Unauthorized use of a plant doesn't invalidate it's patent

RSS story archive

Re: The letter


Well, it seems to me that if that many people had a hand in it, you'd think
someone would have noticed the sexist remark.
Kitty


> [Original Message]
> From: Island Jim <jsinger@igc.org>
> To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
> Date: 5/6/2003 4:00:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [CHAT] The letter
>
> let me join you on the soap box for a moment. rhea, the unfortunate 
> reporter in this instance, didn't do this all by herself. on every 
> publication where i've had the misfortune to work, a reporter's garbled 
> prose is edited by, in turn, the section editor, the rim desk, and
[often] 
> the managing editor or one of the assistant managing editors. that is why
i 
> said i would fire the rim--the often is the last screen to keep stupidly 
> poor writing out of the publication. and stupidly poor writing is the 
> problem with this lede; you have to read it two or three times to figure 
> out what it is trying to say. i think the bad decisions were made, 
> incidentally, because all assembled thought it was nifty to associate 
> gardening with throwing dirt in one's face--kind of juxtaposing a 
> stereotype with a cliche.
>
>
> At 07:16 AM 5/6/03 -0500, you wrote:
> >Regarding my outrage at that writer's reference to "girly", (indicating 
> >effeminite) attributes of gardeners/horticulturists:
> >I'd sort of like to clarify that, as hard working as all us women
> >gardeners are, we know it's not really a slam. And for a man to be
> >considered effeminate, in many ways is a compliment; nothing wrong with
> >it. The reason I'm offended is because, with her choice of the word
> >"girly" and the structure of her sentence, you could tell she MEANT it
> >as a slam. I think that often even we women subconsciously agree with
> >the old-fashioned sterotype of women being considered the weaker sex and
> >are pleasantly surprised when a man chooses work considered out of sinc
> >with traditional male choices. We need to remember that there is no
> >weaker sex. There are general characteristics that should not be used as
> >stereotypes. As my (male) vet said when we discussing neutering a cat,
> >"Most of the problems in this world are testicle-driven." But we still
> >have people like Ghandi and King. And not all women are Mother Theresa.
> >I'd like to think that any good qualities someone might have could be
> >had by both men and women. To be a nurturing person should be an
> >attribute of both sexes, rather than just feminine. To be ambitious
> >should be considered the same trait for both rather than changing the
> >word to pushy if it's a woman.
> >
> >
> >Oh, enough of the soapbox. It's going to take a long time for the world
> >to change, if it ever does. But I say gardeners/horticulturists are a
> >tough breed and tough is neither masculine nore feminine.
> >
> >
> >Kitty
> >
> >-------Original Message-------
> >From: Bonnie & Bill Morgan <wmorgan972@ameritech.net>
> >Sent: 05/06/03 04:43 AM
> >To: kmrsy@earthlink.net
> >Subject: RE: [CHAT] The letter
> >
> > >
> > > Kitty, I think we all are with you on this one!  For one, I sure hope
they
> >print your letter in the editorial page!  After all, nearly all the
> >farmers
> >I knew and know are men and I never in my life heard anyone say they were
> >effeminate!  (My whole family on dad's side was farmers, for goodness
> >sakes.
> >Today cousins in Jasper are still farming and you should see the biceps
on
> >these folks!  Nothing feminine there.)  The author must have led a
> >deprived
> >childhood!
> >
> >Please do let us know whether the letter gets play in the paper or
whether
> >you receive any response from them.
> >
> >Blessings,
> >
> >Bonnie
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-gardenchat@hort.net [mailto:owner-gardenchat@hort.net] On
> >Behalf
> >Of Kitty Morrissy
> >Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 12:09 AM
> >To: Agardenchat
> >Subject: [CHAT] The letter
> >
> >Regarding Rhea Edmonds' Living Section feature article (5/4/3) on the
> >young greenhouse owner, Ryan Baker, I was appalled at her opening
> >sentence.  She wrote, "A long-lived stereotype identifying plant and
> >flower gardening as girly..."  What??  Ms. Edmonds did her subject, Mr
> >Baker, and the entire horticultural community a great disservice by
> >childishly (and unprofessionally) labeling men as effeminate if they
> >possess an interest in this billion dollar industry. By whose standards
> >(other than her own) does she believe men who enjoy plants are "girly"?
> >She interviewed several men for her article including Roger Moll,
> >Cooperative Extension Director.  Did she think them "girly"?  Talk with
> >Allen County Horticultural Educator, Ricky Kemery, about the back-braking
> >labor that flowers and other plants require and she'll discover that
> >horticulture is not for wimps. Most of my professors in my Horticulture
> >courses were men.  Many great garden wrtiers are men.  A large number of
> >our local Master Gardeners are men.  They will all gladly tell you that
> >they have endured sweat and pain for the sake of beauty in our lives.
> >That is NOT "girly".  This stereotype exists only in the writer's mind
> >and she should have had the good journalism sense to keep it to herself.
> >And the JG should have had sense enough to assign this story to a more
> >capable writer.
> >
> >
> >If you have weeds, you don't have enough plants.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> >message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index



 © 1995-2015 Mallorn Computing, Inc.All Rights Reserved.
Our Privacy Statement