Re: OT - Eva - Mail Not Delivered

I have found that my wonderful ISP alters the addresses.  I simply clicked
Reply to your message; I did not type it.  I am finding this more and more
lately.
Kitty
neIN, Z5
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eva Tompkins LaBonte" <evatesq@gmail.com>
To: <gardenchat@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [CHAT] OT - Eva - Mail Not Delivered


> Kitty, I think you misspelled it. I think you left out the "a". It is
> supposed to be evatesq@gmail.com.
>
> On 10/15/05, kmrsy@netzero.net <kmrsy@netzero.net> wrote:
> >
> > Eva, I attempted to reply to a message you sent but it was returned. Any
> > idea why gmail "doesn't like" you?
> >
> > Kitty
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> > Unfortunately, your mail was not delivered to the following address:
> >
> > <evtesq@gmail.com>:
> > 72.14.205.27 <http://72.14.205.27> does not like recipient.
> > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 No such user f17si4091414qba
> > Giving up on 72.14.205.27 <http://72.14.205.27>.
> >
> > --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> >
> > Return-Path: <kmrsy@netzero.net>
> > Received: from
> outbound21-sr.nyc.untd.com<http://outbound21-sr.nyc.untd.com>(
> > webmail28.nyc.untd.com <http://webmail28.nyc.untd.com>
> [10.141.27.168<http://10.141.27.168>
> > ])
> > by smtpout01.nyc.untd.com <http://smtpout01.nyc.untd.com> with SMTP id
> > AABBXCKMFAWV5XFS
> > for <evtesq@gmail.com> (sender <kmrsy@netzero.net>);
> > Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
> > Received: (from kmrsy@netzero.net)
> > by webmail28.nyc.untd.com <http://webmail28.nyc.untd.com> (jqueuemail)
id
> > K7C6N4RQ; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:50:47 PDT
> > Received: from [64.136.26.225 <http://64.136.26.225>] by
> > webmail28.nyc.untd.com <http://webmail28.nyc.untd.com> with HTTP:
> > Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:50:21 GMT
> > X-Originating-IP: [64.136.26.225 <http://64.136.26.225>]
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > From: "kmrsy@netzero.net" <kmrsy@netzero.net>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:50:21 GMT
> > To: evtesq@gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: Sneak Attack on Organic Standards
> > X-Mailer: Webmail Version 3.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="--__JWM__J446b.794bS.15fbM"
> > Message-Id: <20051015.085047.6752.219643@webmail28.nyc.untd.com>
> > X-ContentStamp: 2:2:3177546941
> > X-UNTD-OriginStamp:
> > 7Eo94d05QXEvKTQYF6q6WVPWM1naqY8QL7c45t4FTadtEWbNkmYW4A==
> > X-UNTD-Peer-Info:
> >
>
10.141.27.168|webmail28.nyc.untd.com|outbound21-sr.nyc.untd.com|kmrsy@netzer
o
> .net
> >
> > ----__JWM__J446b.794bS.15fbM
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> > Content-Type: text/plain
> >
> > Geez, it never seems to end, does it, Eva?
> > This administration is determined to destroy everything in its path. It
> > wants to enable big business to gobble up everything it can and spit out
> > adulterated products. Then they prevent small business from even
> > labeling exceptional differences as in when Ben & Jerry wanted to label
> > their ice cream as not including any BGH-tainted milk and the Angus beef
> > company that wanted to test every animal for mad-cow disease and list
> > that on its packages.
> >
> >
> > The damage that has been wrought in these 5 years could take 50 years to
> > undo, if it can be done at all.
> >
> > Kitty
> >
> > Please note: message attached
> >
> >
> >
> > ----__JWM__J446b.794bS.15fbM
> > Content-Type: message/rfc822
> >
> > Return-Path: <evtesq@gmail.com>
> > Received: from mx07.lax.untd.com <http://mx07.lax.untd.com> (
> > mx07.lax.untd.com <http://mx07.lax.untd.com>
> [10.130.24.67<http://10.130.24.67>
> > ])
> > by maildeliver04.nyc.untd.com <http://maildeliver04.nyc.untd.com> with
> > SMTP id AABBXCJXCAGU98SA
> > for <kmrsy@netzero.net> (sender <evtesq@gmail.com>);
> > Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
> > Received: from
> bourbon.democracyinaction.org<http://bourbon.democracyinaction.org>(
> > bourbon.democracyinaction.org <http://bourbon.democracyinaction.org> [
> > 67.19.170.130 <http://67.19.170.130>])
> > by mx07.lax.untd.com <http://mx07.lax.untd.com> with SMTP id
> > AABBXCJXBAUDCD52
> > for <kmrsy@netzero.net> (sender <evtesq@gmail.com>);
> > Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
> > Received: from
> scotch.democracyinaction.org<http://scotch.democracyinaction.org>(
> > scotch.democracyinaction.org <http://scotch.democracyinaction.org> [
> > 67.19.162.194 <http://67.19.162.194>])
> > by bourbon.democracyinaction.org <http://bourbon.democracyinaction.org>
(
> > 8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j9FFQ3wd006525
> > for <kmrsy@netzero.net>; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:26:03 -0400
> > Message-ID: <
> > 12193604.1129391168430.JavaMail.root@scotch.democracyinaction.org>
> > Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 10:46:08 -0500 (CDT)
> > From: Eva <evtesq@gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: evtesq@gmail.com
> > To: kmrsy@netzero.net
> > Subject: Sneak Attack on Organic Standards
> > Mime-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> > boundary="----=_Part_219_5370470.1129391168428"
> > X-ContentStamp: 1:1:2397781786
> >
> >
>
X-MAIL-INFO:0fe9ad2964e1cdad91ad91e1e07d05f50d007479b9740481b9d5d5f981840575
b
>
d4d602dcd9144d5e995b03dc0e9e4e4f075453040c4158941155d41557411e499b49439f9a92
4
> a4501d5051c4a454d024c41deded60c430f4d5306dd43d40d11911dd555db56411c171
> >
> > X-UNTD-Peer-Info:
> >
>
67.19.170.130|bourbon.democracyinaction.org|bourbon.democracyinaction.org|ev
t
> esq@gmail.com
> > X-UNTD-UBE:-1
> >
> > ------=_Part_219_5370470.1129391168428
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> > Hi,
> > Thought you might find this interesting.
> >
> > The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) needs your immediate help to
> > stop Congress and the Bush administration from seriously degrading
> > organic standards. After 35 years of hard work, the U.S. organic
> > community has built up a multi-billion dollar alternative to industrial
> > agriculture, based upon strict organic standards and organic community
> > control over modification to these standards.
> >
> >
> > Now, large corporations such as Kraft & Dean Foods--aided and abetted by
> > the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), are moving to lower organic
> > standards by allowing a Bush appointee to create a list of synthetic
> > ingredients that would be allowed organic production. Even worse these
> > proposed regulatory changes will reduce future public discussion and
> > input and take away the National Organic Standards Board's (NOSB)
> > traditional lead jurisdiction in setting standards. What this means, in
> > blunt terms. is that USDA bureaucrats and industry lobbyists, not
> > consumers, will now have more control over what can go into organic
> > foods and products.
> >
> >
> > This week, acting in haste and near-total secrecy, the U.S. Senate will
> > vote on a "rider" to the 2006 Agriculture Appropriations Bill that will
> > reduce control over organic standards from the National Standards Board
> > and put this control in the hands of federal bureaucrats in the USDA
> > (remember the USDA proposal in 1997-98 that said that genetic
> > engineering, toxic sludge, and food irradiation would be OK on organic
> > farms, or USDA suggestions in 2004 that heretofore banned pesticides,
> > hormones, tainted feeds, and animal drugs would be OK?).
> >
> >
> > For the past week in Washington, OCA has been urging members of the
> > Senate not to reopen and subvert the federal statute that governs U.S.
> > Organic standards (the Organic Food Production Act - OFPA), but rather
> > to let the organic community and the National Organic Standards resolve
> > our differences over issues like synthetics and animal feed internally,
> > and then proceed to a open public comment period. Unfortunately most
> > Senators seem to be listening to industry lobbyists more closely than to
> > us. We need to raise our voices.
> >
> >
> > In the past, grassroots mobilization and mass pressure by organic
> > consumers have been able to stop the USDA and Congress from degrading
> > organic standards. This time Washington insiders tell us that the "fix
> > is is already in." So we must take decisive action now. We need you to
> > call your U.S. Senators today. We need you to sign the following
> > petition and send it to everyone you know. We also desperately need
> > funds to head off this attack in the weeks and months to come. Thank you
> > for your support. Together we will take back citizen control over
> > organic standards and preserve organic integrity.
> >
> >
> > Take action here:
> >
> >
>
http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=1242
> >
> > ------=_Part_219_5370470.1129391168428
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Hi,<BR/>Thought you might find this interesting.<BR/><BR/>The Organic
> > Consu=
> > mers Association (OCA) needs your immediate help to stop Congress and
the
> > B=
> > ush administration from seriously degrading organic standards. After 35
> > yea=
> > rs of hard work, the U.S. organic community has built up a multi-billion
> > do=
> > llar alternative to industrial agriculture, based upon strict organic
> > stand=
> > ards and organic community control over modification to these
> > standards.<BR=
> > /><BR/>Now, large corporations such as Kraft & Dean Foods--aided and
> > abette=
> > d by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), are moving to lower
> > organic=
> > standards by allowing a Bush appointee to create a list of synthetic
> > ingre=
> > dients that would be allowed organic production. Even worse these
proposed
> > =
> > regulatory changes will reduce future public discussion and input and
take
> > =
> > away the National Organic Standards Board's (NOSB) traditional lead
> > jurisdi=
> > ction in setting standards. What this means, in blunt terms. is that
USDA
> > b=
> > ureaucrats and industry lobbyists, not consumers, will now have more
> > contro=
> > l over what can go into organic foods and products.<BR/><BR/>This week,
> > act=
> > ing in haste and near-total secrecy, the U.S. Senate will vote on a
> > "rider"=
> > to the 2006 Agriculture Appropriations Bill that will reduce control
over
> > =
> > organic standards from the National Standards Board and put this control
> > in=
> > the hands of federal bureaucrats in the USDA (remember the USDA proposal
> > i=
> > n 1997-98 that said that genetic engineering, toxic sludge, and food
> > irradi=
> > ation would be OK on organic farms, or USDA suggestions in 2004 that
> > hereto=
> > fore banned pesticides, hormones, tainted feeds, and animal drugs would
be
> > =
> > OK?).<BR/><BR/>For the past week in Washington, OCA has been urging
> > members=
> > of the Senate not to reopen and subvert the federal statute that governs
> > U=
> > .S. Organic standards (the Organic Food Production Act - OFPA), but
rather
> > =
> > to let the organic community and the National Organic Standards resolve
> > our=
> > differences over issues like synthetics and animal feed internally, and
> > th=
> > en proceed to a open public comment period. Unfortunately most Senators
> > see=
> > m to be listening to industry lobbyists more closely than to us. We need
> > to=
> > raise our voices.<BR/><BR/>In the past, grassroots mobilization and mass
> > p=
> > ressure by organic consumers have been able to stop the USDA and
Congress
> > f=
> > rom degrading organic standards. This time Washington insiders tell us
> > that=
> > the "fix is is already in." So we must take decisive action now. We need
> > y=
> > ou to call your U.S. Senators today. We need you to sign the following
> > peti=
> > tion and send it to everyone you know. We also desperately need funds to
> > he=
> > ad off this attack in the weeks and months to come. Thank you for your
> > supp=
> > ort. Together we will take back citizen control over organic standards
and
> > =
> > preserve organic integrity.<BR/><BR/>Take action here:<BR/>
> > http://www.demac=
> >
>
tion.org/dia/organizations/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=3D1242<http://tion.
o
> rg/dia/organizations/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=3D1242>
> > <BR/>
> > <BR>Take action now at <a href=3D'
> > http://www.democracyinaction.org/oca/camp=
> > aign.jsp?campaign_KEY=3D1242'>
> > http://www.democracyinaction.org/oca/campaign=
> > .jsp?campaign_KEY=3D1242</a>
> > ------=_Part_219_5370470.1129391168428--
> >
> >
> > ----__JWM__J446b.794bS.15fbM--
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> > message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Eva
> Long Island, NY
> Zone 6/7
>
> Honor our dead. Demand the truth.
> http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/
> http://www.downingstreetmemo.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE GARDENCHAT
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index