This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: [GWL]: New Rant Expanded


On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 10:04:04 -0800 Jeff Ball <jeffball@starband.net>
writes:
Monitoring is key to the success of IPM 
> and
> monitoring is a completely unreasonable expectation for the average 
> gardener
> much less the average yardener. Using beneficial insects works in 
> the
> commercial setting but in the home landscape it is a waste of money. 
>  Ants,
> spiders, and ground beetles, not found in the fields, are available 
> in all
> yards to handle the pest insect problem better than any release of 
> lady
> bugs.  The IPM principle of using least toxic materials is 
> appropriate, but
> that is about all.

Dear Jeff,

I understand all the other points but what are you suggesting for the
home gardener rather than IPM?

Fran
Fran Gustman, Editor
HortResources Newsletter
New England Horticultural Resources Network
Boston, MA
fgustman@juno.com

------------------------------------------------------------
Join "Anthrax Update Discussion List" now!
  http://www.topica.com/lists/anthrax-d/

Pass the word to garden writers, editors publishers, horticultural businesses about our list.

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: topica.com@spamfodder.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrGSS.bVSZwB
Or send an email to: Gardenwriters-unsubscribe@topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index