This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under GDPR Article 89.

Re: Compost


Sounds like you are making top quality compost between your wormery and the
leaf mold. The other compost, the more casual one, is obviously fine for the
garden, too. What I mean by quality is a compost with balanced levels of
nutrients, including trace elements, a pH about 6.5, very few weed seeds or
pathogens, and no phytotoxic compounds. Very often, composts are poisonous
to plants until they have cured--that's why you let them sit for three
months after you have finished making them. And that is what the cress test
determines--an unfinished compost kills cress seedlings on or shortly after
emergence.

On a home level, I make a very haphazard pile--it takes a long time to
mature because I don't pay much attention to ratios of this and that and I
rarely turn it. But it eventually gets there. Right now, it's growing a few
avocados; until the frost a few weeks ago, it had a nice mango on one edge.
I was leaving it there, just as I am leaving the avocados, out of some kind
of perversity. Soon thought, I will be industrious and turn it and destroy
the trees.

Miranda

On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Kathryn Marsh <kmarsh@iol.ie> wrote:

> Just wondering what is meant by quality in this context. In my
> younger days I built perfectly constructed piles as homes for
> thermophilic bacteria and they duly heated, were turned and watered
> etc, etc. The result was a fairly small amount of quickly made weed
> free compost that needed at least six months before the soil life was
> really happy there - though at least I never got weed seeds in my
> sowing mixes.  A bit embarrassing the time I was building heaps in a
> hurry and got distracted by need to do the paperwork for an up and
> coming organic inspection. Forgot to water pile. Pile went up in
> flames during inspection.
>
> These days I throw in whatever organic material happens to come to
> hand whenever it comes to hand, spread it evenly across the heap,
> water it if it seems dry and don't bother much. With this haphazard
> method I get a lot more compost and some of the weed seeds survive.
> Some of the flower seeds survive as well so there's often all sorts
> of interesting things emerging in my seed trays and across the
> garden. My plants seem to like it. I don't use much of it as a sowing
> medium though because I make leaf mould heaps separately, watering
> them well when I've gathered them and then covering them and
> forgetting for a couple of years. All my kitchen waste that doesn't
> have seeds is fed, along with shredded newspaper to the inhabitants
> of my wormery. This gets mixed with the leafmould as sowing compost
> or, with a higher ratio of worm casts, as potting compost.
>
> kathryn
>
>
>
> On 14 Jan 2008, at 17:07, Miranda Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, the way that you compost determines the quality of the finished
> > project. I've done enough research, complete with testing all the way
> > through and at the time that it was stockpiled for curing, 3 months
> > after
> > that time, and 6 months after that, to know that is so--the
> > "formal" way,
> > with or without composters in tuxedos and tiaras, gives the highest
> > quality
> > product.
> >
> > But there is a huge caveat. Unless you are using the compost as a
> > disease
> > suppressant, in greenhouse containers or starting mixes, or composting
> > something smelly in a suburban environment, does improved quality
> > matter
> > enough to inspire you to monitor the piles every day and adjust
> > accordingly?
> > I don't think so. For ordinary uses, sloppy compost works fine--as
> > long as
> > it's really broken down. And you can tell that with a simple "cress
> > test."
> > Before you buy compost, do a cress test with it: take a sample,
> > plant land
> > cress in it--no additives like peat moss or vermiculite--and see
> > how they
> > do. If they are fine, you can use it in starting mixes. If not, you
> > know
> > that it requires a few more months of curing before it is safe to
> > use for
> > sensitive applications.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Miranda
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gardenwriters mailing list
> gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters
>
> GWL has searchable archives at:
> http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters
>
> Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
> at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos
>
> Post gardening questions/threads to
> &quot;Gardenwriters on Gardening&quot; &lt;gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org&gt;
>
> For GWL website and Wiki, go to
> http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters
>
_______________________________________________
gardenwriters mailing list
gardenwriters@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/gardenwriters

GWL has searchable archives at:
http://www.hort.net/lists/gardenwriters

Send photos for GWL to gwlphotos@hort.net to be posted
at: http://www.hort.net/lists/gwlphotos

Post gardening questions/threads to
&quot;Gardenwriters on Gardening&quot; &lt;gwl-g@lists.ibiblio.org&gt;

For GWL website and Wiki, go to
http://www.ibiblio.org/gardenwriters



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index